My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Special Exception - 508 & 512 W Colfax
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Resolutions/Special Resolutions
>
2012
>
Special Exception - 508 & 512 W Colfax
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2012 10:33:49 AM
Creation date
9/5/2012 4:13:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Resolutions
City Counci - Date
7/23/2012
Ord-Res Number
4179-12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Area Board of Zoning Appeals — June 6, 2012 <br />SOUTH BEND HERITAGE FOUNDATION, INC. <br />The petition of South Bend Heritage Foundation, Inc. seeking a Special Exception to allow for a commercial <br />parking lot, on property located at 508 & 512 W. Colfax Street, Portage Township. Zoned "MU ". <br />MR. PAT LYNCH: With South Bend Heritage Foundation, 803 Lincolnway West, South Bend. We are <br />here today to request a Special Exception for a commercial lot at the address that was mentioned. We're <br />doing this project in conjunction with redevelopment of the Rushton Building which sits on the corner of <br />west Washington and William. And we're very excited about that project and we'll make this lot available <br />to the seniors who will be living at that project. <br />MR. URBANSKI: Is there some parking right behind the building too, Pat, behind the Rushton Building? <br />MR. LYNCH: That property immediately north of the Rushton does not belong to the Rushton it belongs to <br />the next building north. The Rushton does not have access directly to the alley. <br />MR. URBANSKI: Okay will the people have to walk all the way around to William Street to enter the <br />building? <br />MR. LYNCH: That is correct. <br />MS. NAYDER: Just want to point out where our comments are. They're in the Special Exception, so <br />there's 1.3 and then 15 so didn't want you to miss because we did make comments on petition number 14. <br />We recommended favorably because it's going to help with the re -use of an existing building. <br />MR. VELLEMAN: Will there be any improvement to the alley done by either the City or South Bend <br />Heritage. It was a pretty rough alley when I drove down it. <br />MR. LYNCH: It is rough, I agree. I'm with Toy Villa in Engineering right now. And we also have to get <br />into that alley a little bit to bring power to the Rushton. So we do intend to improve at least from our parking <br />lot to the east William Street, yeah. <br />IN FAVOR <br />MR. WILLIAM PERKINS: I live at 119 N. Taylor Street. I live right around the corner from the property <br />in question. And I want to know how big is the parking lot going to be and what they plan on doing as far as <br />landscaping and also how it's going,to affect the apartment building directly next to it which is now <br />unoccupied and being renovated. Before it had a reputation for being undesirable, yeah will it be? And I <br />really want to see the Rushton, I'd love to see the Rushton rehabilitated, I really would. I also wonder how <br />many people are going to make the actual stroll from the parking lot in the dead of winter over to the <br />Rushton. That's kind of a little hike there. I wonder if there is some other way they could get a parking lot <br />there. So I just basically have questions about the whole thing. <br />MR. PERKINS WAS SHOWN A SITE PLAN OF THE PARKING LOT AT THIS TIME <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.