My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-11-08 Community and Economic Development
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
2008
>
02-11-08 Community and Economic Development
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2008 2:19:37 PM
Creation date
3/6/2008 2:19:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
2/11/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Community and Economic Development Committee <br />February 11, 2008 <br />Page 6 <br />Council President Rouse voice concern over provisions in the current version of HB <br />1001 which treat long-term residents of the city differently than new persons with regard <br />to mortgage exemptions, homestead credits, etc. <br />Mayor Luecke noted that the Council has already implemented protections in the <br />memorandum of agreement (MOA) with regard to the current circuit breaker language. <br />Council Member Oliver Davis stated that it might be beneficial to be briefed by State <br />Senator John Broden. <br />Council Member White noted that she would like additional time to address this topic. <br />She hoped that the Council and the Administration could "dig deeper to find out the true <br />impact of the proposed state law". She hoped that no proposed development projects <br />would be negatively impacted. <br />Dr. Varner noted that he has been a supporter of tax abatements which create new <br />assessments for the city. However he believes that concerns raised should be carefully <br />studied. If the state law ends up with a 1% cap for home owners, he questions the need <br />going forward for residential tax abatements. He stated that he likes the idea of a delay <br />so that more information could be studied. He added that for large projects during a 6- <br />week period, that there could be interim thresholds in place to capture such new large <br />developments. <br />Council Member White noted that "large projects" would have to be defined. <br />Council Member Dieter suggested that everyone send their comments on the proposed <br />"Position Statement on Tax Abatement" to him. <br />In response to questions from President Rouse, Mr. Mathia and the Council Attorney <br />noted that claw back provisions and the circuit breaker language is in the MOAs which <br />must be filed with the City Clerk's Office, prior to the Council moving forward on the <br />Confirmatory Resolution for such projects. Toro and Accuride are the only abatements <br />which have been taken away by the Common Council. <br />Council President Rouse stated that tax abatement may be a "great economic tool" as <br />many have stated, however he wants to see that data and evaluate it. He stated that he <br />has a serious concern for the entire city and that is why he is working with Council <br />Member Dieter on this topic. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.