My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 05-07-59
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1956-1959
>
1959
>
RM 05-07-59
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2012 3:54:39 PM
Creation date
9/4/2012 2:22:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
With our wn Inspector (on our payroll, but working out of the Building Com- <br />missions 's Office) we will get full time slum prevention for monies spent. <br />A Relocation Director will be necessitated during the last half of 1960 because the <br />execution of the project will then take place, involving the purchasing of properties, <br />and displacement of families. <br />A Community Organization Worker would also be an asset in any rehabilitation <br />effort, since he could get neighborhood organizations started and develop citizens' <br />cooperation. <br />Two raises have been proposed - one for the Draftsman (/ $400 per year) since <br />he will take on additional work of part -time Inspector - and one for the staff <br />Secretary (� $300 per year) since she will be taking on the additional duties of <br />Bookkeeper. <br />The proposed 1960 Budget. shows a decrease over the 1959 Budget of $8, 650. <br />Factors contributing to the decrease are the fund balance from last year, the <br />anticipated federal contribution and the omission of a General Fund Loan. The <br />total estimated budget for 1960 comes to $79, 400, which in turn reduces the <br />required redevelopment tax to .9�. <br />The prop sed budget sheets were distributed to the Commissioners for their <br />individual study and review, so that they will be prepared to discuss the budget <br />in more detail at the next monthly meeting. <br />6. IIDUS CUS;SI18M GIF 1F ON —AS;S US;'I EID) I RIE13$AMILI1'IE'AU]ION EDRC7TI;C;Y <br />There was discussion of the possibility of undertaking "non- assisted" rehabilitation <br />or con-oer ation projects in areas where the public investment would not have to <br />be very substantial. This could be done even if no 1959 Housing Legislation is <br />approved by the White House. <br />Several p�ssible areas of this kind were mentioned. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.