My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 05-07-59
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1956-1959
>
1959
>
RM 05-07-59
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2012 3:54:39 PM
Creation date
9/4/2012 2:22:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2 . IRIEP7KY ON 1F A1811RO (CONIF]EIRIENGIE - MAIMIS ON , W]ISiC ;GNSiIIN <br />April 5 - 8, 1959 <br />Mr. Sucher Igave a brief summary of the NAHRO Conference which he and <br />Mr. Neidi-ah had attended in Madison.- <br />Included in is summary were examples of how different "Fight Blight" organi- <br />zations could be quite effective. A staff interprets the city's rehabilitation <br />requirements to the property owners, and obtains lists of approved contractors. <br />In some cases where the families involved don't have the money, the work is <br />done by taking the monies from a revolving fund and paying the contractor with <br />same. The family will then pay back into the fund. on a monthly basis. The <br />money originally supporting this fund comes from private citizens, with $10, 000 <br />being the original investment (in Wilmington, Delaware). <br />He also rep rted that in general rehabilitation needs more ironing out. In some <br />cities private construction firms have gone in and bought run down homes in sound <br />neighborhoo s, rehabilitated them, and after the rehabilitation, got FHA commit - <br />ments ands ld them at a profit. <br />3. EDIRG 051EED 'I�K1I&' YQ JERK IIUH.R11�3.� N IRIENIEV AIL, AIIDMIINIISiUIRA - <br />'1 I1O ®FIFIICCIE - CCIIHIIICAGO <br />Mr. Helmen brought up the fact that the planning process of the Sample Street <br />Project seerned to be moving rather slowly, and wanted to know how faster <br />action could be obtained. <br />Mr. Sucher stated that our proposal was to complete the planning, and obtain <br />the necessary approvals by the Planning Commission, City Council and Urban <br />Renewal Administration on the project by July 1960. Some of the requirements <br />just necessitate that amount of time, such as the three separate sets of appraisals <br />for each of t e 350 properties in the area, with individual plan sketches and <br />photos of all units, etc. The date of July 1960 has been based on the amount of <br />work yet to e done. <br />Mr. Sucher went on to explain that each major step takes one to two months for <br />federal reviews. In the future, while federal reviews are being conducted, we <br />hope to be able to spend this time on another project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.