My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10173-12 Amend Code Ch 2 Art 8 Sec 2-125.1 Whistleblower Protection
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Ordinances
>
2012
>
10173-12 Amend Code Ch 2 Art 8 Sec 2-125.1 Whistleblower Protection
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2012 4:35:27 PM
Creation date
8/29/2012 3:02:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Ordinances
City Counci - Date
7/23/2012
Ord-Res Number
10173-12
Bill Number
20-12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Substitute Bill No. 20 -12 <br />Ordinance No. l ©(7 3 _ ( ), <br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, <br />AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE 8, BY THE INCLUSION OF NEW SECTION 2 -125.1 OF <br />THE SOUTH BEND MUNICIPAL CODE ADDRESSING WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION <br />STATEMENT OF PURPOSE AND INTENT <br />Indiana Code § 4- 15 -10 -4 sets for the whistleblower protection provisions which provide in <br />part that a state employer cannot dismiss, withhold salary increases or employment- related benefits, <br />transfer or reassignment if an employee reports a violation of a federal or state law. This particular <br />section is part of the State Employees' Bill of Rights. Indiana Code § 5- 11 -5.5 sets forth the <br />regulations address "False Claims and Whistleblower Protection" which apply to the state but not <br />political subdivisions. <br />Indiana Code § 21 -39 -3 sets forth various whistleblower protection regulations addressing <br />employees of state educational institutions who make good faith reports of alleged violation of a law or <br />university policy. <br />Many municipalities throughout the country have ordinances which prohibit reprisals, <br />including the City of Indianapolis, Indiana. <br />On May 21, 2012, six (6) members of the South Bend Common Council voiced concern over <br />the apparent lack of policies, procedures and protocols with regard to telephonic equipment and <br />technology used by the City of South Bend. <br />The City of South Bend currently posts on its city website various forms and policies and the <br />effective date of each. These posted policies govern five (5) specific areas, namely: operating, <br />finance, purchasing, human resources, and information technology. The topic of "human resources" <br />lists its status as "In Draft ". In light of that status, the following ordinance is introduced to provide <br />whistleblower protection to city employees. <br />Section I. Chapter 2, Article 8, Section 2 -125.1 of the South Bend Municipal Code is created to read in <br />its entirety as follows: <br />Sec. 2 -125.1 Whistleblower Protection. 1 <br />(a) Except as provided in I(b) herein, no city elected official, city employee or city appointee <br />shall retaliate or threaten to retaliate against any person because the person did any of the following: <br />(1) Filed a written complaint with the Director of Human Resources alleging <br />wrongful conduct which is defined as a violation of applicable state and /or <br />t The regulations are consistent with the following legal authority addressing protected activities and retaliatory adverse employment <br />actions: Stone v. City of Indianapolis Pub. Utility Div., et al 281 F. 3d 640 (7th Cir. 2002); Whittaker v. Northern Illinois University, 424 <br />F. 3d 640 (7th Cir. 2005); and Whirlpool Corp. v. Vanderburgh County-City, 875 N.E. 2d 751 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.