Laserfiche WebLink
RFP Selection Ratin for Ciy of South Bend Des. No. 1801240 <br />(City, County, Town) or (Local Public Agency) <br />Services Description: Flashing School Beacons for 39 Schools <br />Consultant Name: <br />Evaluation Criteria to be Rated by Scorers <br />Category 'Scoring Criteria <br />Scale Score Weight Weighted <br />Score <br />Performance evaluation score averages from historical performance data. <br />Past Quality score for similar work from performance database. <br />6 <br />Performance Schedule score from performance database. <br />3 <br />Responsiveness score from performance database. <br />i l7 <br />Capacity of Evaluation of the team's personnel and equipment to perform the project on time. <br />Team to do Availability of more than adequate capacity that results in added value. <br />➢ 20 <br />Adequate capacity to meet the schedule. <br />Work <br />r, <br />0) V <br />Insufficient available ca acity to meet the schedule. <br />-1 <br />Technical Expertise: Unique Resources that yield a relevant added value or <br />efficiency to the deliverable. <br />Team's Demonstrated outstanding expertise and resources identified <br />2 <br />Demonstrated for required services for value added benefit. <br />Demonstrated high level of expertise and resources identified <br />15 <br />Qualifications <br />I <br />for required services for value added benefit. <br />Expertise and resources at appropriate level. <br />0 <br />Insufficient ex ertise and/or resources. <br />-3 <br />Predicted ability to manage the project, based on: experience in size, complexity, <br />type, subs, documentation skills. <br />Project Demonstrated outstanding experience in similar type and complexity. <br />Demonstrated high level in <br />2 <br />20 (� <br />of experience similar type and complexity. <br />Manager <br />1 a <br />Experience in similar type and complexity shown in resume, <br />0 <br />Experience in different type or lower complexity. <br />-1 <br />Insufficient experience. <br />-3 <br />Project Understanding and Innovation that provides cost and/or time savings. <br />Approach to High level of understanding and viable innovative ideas proposed. <br />High level <br />2 `. <br />$ <br />of understanding of the project. <br />Project <br />1 15 <br />Basic understanding of the project. <br />0 <br />I..ack of gro ect undvrstandin . <br />-3 <br />Weighted Sub -Total: Q G; <br />It is the responsibility of scorers to make every effort to identify the firm most capable of producing the highest deliverables in a timely and cost <br />effective manner without regard to personal preference. <br />I certify that I do not have any conflicts of interest associated with this consultant as defined in 49CFRI 18.36. <br />I have thoroughly reviewed the letter of interest for this consultant and certify that the above scores represent my best judgment of this firm's abilities. <br />Signature: ;et? <br />Title: �• <br />(Form Rev. 4-7-16) <br />PrintName: <br />Date: �1.1 ( .. ,.m.... ..... .... „, <br />