My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-04-19 Utilities
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
2019
>
Utilities
>
02-04-19 Utilities
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2019 8:23:16 AM
Creation date
3/12/2019 8:23:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
2/4/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF SOUTH BEND OFFICE OF THE CLERK <br /> He went on,We were able to model accurately which areas of the City we could actually eliminate <br /> the CSO volume. You could build green infrastructure all around the City and it might not have a <br /> large impact, but there are certain areas where you could put green infrastructure where it would <br /> make a large impact. You would be able to bridge that gap from the capacity that you have versus <br /> the quantity that you have. We know that we have thirty-five(35) CSO basins in South Bend, and <br /> there are nine (9) of these where we are specifically able to build green infrastructure that it will <br /> work and we know that it will be able to meet its objective. The green infrastructure eliminated a <br /> number of the small tanks, specifically, the tank at Leeper Park and the tank at Brownfield Park. <br /> They were quite small realistically, and we were able to eliminate them entirely from the plan with <br /> green infrastructure. When you reduce the size of the tank from 2 million gallons to 1.5 million <br /> gallons, you have a small savings. The real savings comes from eliminating a tank entirely. The <br /> new plan is called a smarter alternative for a greener environment. It is smarter because it relies on <br /> smart infrastructure, its an alternative because it's an alternative to the bad plan that we had, and <br /> its greener because its better for the water quality and it is better for the community structure. <br /> He continued, Also, it has gone through a renegotiation. We have to be very careful about how <br /> everything is planted and portrayed, and this plan is definitely the right plan for South Bend. We <br /> didn't want to just call this some series of numbers and digits, we wanted to emphasize that this is <br /> the appropriate smarter and greener plan for South Bend. Another example is the portrayal of the <br /> differences. We are continuing to make the green plan better the whole time. The green(referring <br /> to the presentation) is a comparison to the yellow, which is where we are at the moment. The <br /> currently mandated LTCP that is in our consent decree at the moment, versus the SAGE Plan. <br /> Some of the things to emphasize are the residential indicator and the calculation that the EPA <br /> created, whereby you are expected to have a ratio that shows the relationship between a sewer bill <br /> and a medium household income in a community. If you're above two percent(2%)it is considered <br /> high,if you are less than two percent(2%),two percent(2%)to one(1%)percent it is medium and <br /> less than one percent (1%) is low. We were at three point six nine percent (3.69%), which is <br /> exceptionally high, and we managed to get it down to the right amount, close to two percent(2%). <br /> Committee Chair Teshka asked, To be clear, the three point six nine percent(3.69%) is where we <br /> would be if we went through with the current TCP? SAGE would be two point one two percent <br /> (2.12%). Can you explain the current conditions, where we're at? <br /> Mr. Fahey explained, That's if we stop spending, if we just said we're done. <br /> Committee Chair Teshka asked, Do you know where we're at on that residential indicator? <br /> Mr. Fahey stated, These are designed for future planning for future projects. We don't have any <br /> projects right now that we are building on, so it wouldn't really be possible to come up with one <br /> (1)because you would just be talking about a sewer bill. <br /> Mr. Horvath stated,We could calculate it and it would probably be around one point seven percent <br /> (1.7%). <br /> Committee Chair Teshka asked, So,what is the current sewer bill in relation to household income, <br /> if it is calculable? <br /> EXCELLENCE ACCOUNTABILITY I INNOVATION I INCLUSION I EMPOWERMENT <br /> 455 County-City Building 227 W.Jefferson Bvld South Bend,Indiana 46601 p 574.235.9221 f574.235.9173 TTD 574.235.5567 www.southbendin.gov <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.