My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-28-08 Common Council Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Common Council Meeting Minutes
>
2008
>
01-28-08 Common Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2008 8:45:04 AM
Creation date
2/18/2008 2:15:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETING <br />JANUARY 28, 2008 <br />reinstating funding when the citizens see actual results. Mr. Niezgodski concluded by <br />reiterating that the citizens of South bend deserve and must demand greater <br />accountability and transparency from elected officials. <br />COMMENTS FROM MR. STEPHEN RANGE REGARDING PIT BULL DOGS <br />Mr. Range advised about Black Codes a terminology used after the Civil War and a term <br />used to describe lawful ordinances that gave African Americans a set of 2"d Class Civil <br />Rights. He stated that he believes that the City of South Bend has an ordinance that gives <br />African Americans 2"d Class Civil Rights and those Ordinances can be found in Chapter <br />5 of the South Bend Municipal Code Entitled Animals and Fowl Article 1 Section 5-1. It <br />defines American Pit Bull Terriers as dangerous and vicious animals as a whole. He <br />stated that the definition of an American Pit Bull Terrier means that the breed of dog <br />registered and described with the United Kennel Club and the American Dog Breeder's <br />Association as the American Pit Bull Terrier also know as the Pit Bull Terrier and any <br />cross breed of the American Pit Bull Terrier but does not include the breed known as the <br />American Staffordshire Terrier. The American Pit Bull Terrier and the American <br />Staffordshire Terrier is the exact same dog. The only difference between the two breeds <br />is that it is more common for an African American to call their dog an American Pit Bull <br />Terrier and the wealthier Caucasian to call their dog an American Staffordshire Terrier. <br />Most dogs are registered with the AKC as an Amercian Staffordshire Terrier and dually <br />registered with the UKC as an American Pit Bull Terrier. Mr. Range stated that means <br />that you can have a dog registered as an American Staffordshire Terrier and an American <br />Pit Bull Terrier. He stated that he has contacted numerous organizations throughout the <br />United States such as the United States Custom Services Search and Rescue Team; St. <br />Joseph County Center for Disease Control; ASPCA; the American Temperament Test <br />Society which is based out of Indianapolis. He stated that he has read and study several <br />court cases involving breed specific legislation of ordinances and they all agree that breed <br />specific ordinances and legislation do not solve any problems when it comes down to the <br />dangerous dog issues and they also all agree that breed specific ordinances and legislation <br />are unconstitutional. Mr. Range stated that the American Temperament Test Society sent <br />him a number of results from test that they conducted. The results noted that the <br />American Pit Bull Terrier has passed the American Temperament Test Society with an <br />84.3% rating. When they tested the American Staffordshire Terrier they passed with an <br />83.9% rating. The Australian Shepard only passed with an 80.7%, the Golden Retriever <br />83.8%, Collie 79.2%. Mr. Range stated that the American Pit Bull Terrier passed the <br />American Temperament Test Society's testing well above some of the other breeds that <br />were tested and not considered dangerous and vicious. He urged the Council to take the <br />time to sit down with him and take the necessary measures needed to amend this <br />ordinance. <br />COMMENTS FROM MR. GEORGE LANE REGARDING CITIZENS FOR <br />ACCOUNTABILITY <br />Mr. George Lane, 2405 Division St. Mishawaka, Indiana, advised that he is the Director <br />of Citizens for Accountability of Government, Inc. He stated that they serve the entire <br />State of Indiana. Mr. Lane stated that some members of his organization had contacted <br />him regarding the article written on accountability and transparency in local government. <br />Mr. Lane stated that he has called Mayor Luecke's office and relayed a message to the <br />secretary that he should read the article written by Mr. Niezgodski. He stated that <br />citizens are tired of the same old government and want accountability and transparency. <br />Mr. Lane stated that he is trouble by the way elected officials respond to phone calls. He <br />stated that he calls local officials quite regularly and in his opinion the local officials <br />don't respond in a timely manner. It seems like they don't care whether they call you <br />back or not. He stated that Mayor Luecke is very bad in returning phone calls. He stated <br />that the Mayor has only called him back once on an issue regarding the road that divides <br />South Bend and Mishawka. Mr. Lane stated that the Mayor works for the people, the <br />people don't work for him. Mr. Lane stated that Councilmember Dieter never returned <br />his phone call either. He stated that Councilmember Varner always returns his phone <br />calls. No matter how many times he called Dr. Varner he always takes the time out of his <br />busy schedule to return a phone call. He urged the Council to return phone calls when a <br />constituent calls with a problem. <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.