My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
No. 0739 ratifying/confirming Res. No. 737, designating the SBCDA, dedlaring the SBCDA to be blighted, approving a dev. plan/conditions under which relocation payments will be made, purposes of TIF
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Resolutions
>
No. 0739 ratifying/confirming Res. No. 737, designating the SBCDA, dedlaring the SBCDA to be blighted, approving a dev. plan/conditions under which relocation payments will be made, purposes of TIF
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2013 8:04:57 PM
Creation date
8/3/2012 3:33:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
t, 851,178 0 <br />5. There are fifteen (15) residential structures. <br />All of these structures (100 %) require cosmetic <br />and /or structural repairs. <br />6. Over the last three years the number of <br />environmental complaints has increased from <br />twenty -two in 1982 to thirty -four in 1984. In <br />1982 the City of South Bend Department of Code <br />Enforcement only had six clean -ups in the area. <br />That increased to twenty -six in 1983 and <br />thirty -one through the first ten months of 1984. <br />7. The East Bank Development Area was declared a <br />redevelopment area in late 1980. In 1981 the area <br />was rezoned from "D" Light Industrial to "A -3" <br />Mixed Use Residential. In spite of the rezoning <br />to a residential classification, residential <br />growth has not taken place. In fact the total <br />number of housing units has decreased from <br />twenty -one (21) in 1980 to eighteen (18) in 1984. <br />C. In the portion of the Area previously designated as the <br />Monroe Sample Development Area: <br />1. Fourteen percent (14 %) of the land is currently <br />vacant. (This does not include land used for <br />streets and alleys.) <br />2. There are one hundred eighteen (118) residential <br />structures. Twenty -two (22) of these structures <br />(19 %) require major cosmetic and /or structural <br />repairs. Eighty -four (84) structures (71 %) <br />require minor cosmetic repairs. <br />D. In the portion of the Area designated in Resolution No. <br />737 as Expansion Area No. 1: <br />1. Forty -two percent (42 %) of the land is currently <br />vacant. (This does not include land used for <br />streets and alleys.) <br />2. Nearly eight percent (8 %) of the area is land with <br />vacant buildings. <br />3. Of the seven (7) commercial or industrial <br />buildings, two (2) are vacant (28 %). <br />4. Of the nine (9) residential structures, five (5) <br />require major structural or cosmetic repairs (55 %) <br />and four (4) require minor cosmetic repairs (45 %). <br />E. In the portion of the Area designated in Resolution No. <br />737 as Expansion Area No. 2: <br />1. Twenty -three percent (23 %) of the land is <br />currently vacant. (This does not include land <br />used for streets and alleys.) <br />2. Of the eighteen (18) commercial or industrial <br />buildings, four (4) are vacant and one (1) is <br />underutilized. This means that twenty -eight <br />percent (28 %) of the commercial or industrial <br />buildings are vacant or underutilized. <br />3. Of the sixteen (16) residential structures, all of <br />them (100 %) require major or minor cosmetic <br />repairs. <br />F. In the portion of the Area designated in Resolution No. <br />737 as Expansion Area No. 3: <br />1. Thirty percent (30 %) of the land is currently <br />underutilized. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.