My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-06-08 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
02-06-08 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2008 3:43:12 PM
Creation date
2/15/2008 3:37:17 PM
Metadata
Document Relationships
02-06-08 Redevelopment Commission Agenda
(Superseded by)
Path:
\Public\Redevelopment Commission\Agendas & Packets\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Rescheduled Regular Meeting –February 6, 2008 <br /> <br />5. OLD BUSINESS (CONT.) <br /> <br />A. Other <br /> <br />(1) continued… <br /> <br />substitute version deals not only with title <br />services, but appraisals, land surveys, and <br />Phase I Environmental Surveys. It <br />encompasses all of the types of pre-closing <br />services that staff routinely engages in and <br />sets certain maximum fees. <br /> <br />Mr. Peczkowski noted that counsel did not <br />make the change he suggested at the last <br />meeting in point two. “All contracts <br />originated by staff must be related to <br />property in which the Commission has <br />expressed an interest in acquiring.” He <br />preferred to see that stricken and have the <br />paragraph say only, “All contracts originated <br />by staff must be related to property which the <br />Commission owns, intends to sell, use, <br />exchange, lease or otherwise engage in <br />disposition.” He felt the phrase as it currently <br />reads in the resolution was too “open.” He <br />was afraid of putting so much money into a <br />project on the front end that we feel <br />compelled to go ahead with it. Mr. Leone <br />responded that that is a policy issue for the <br />Commission. <br /> <br />Mr. Downes and Mr. King disagreed with <br />Mr. Peczkowski’s point of view. They felt to <br />delete the portion would defeat the purpose <br />of what the resolution is intended to <br />accomplish, streamlining the process. <br /> <br />Mr. King asked Mr. Leone to confirm that <br />none of these actions being conferred to staff <br />in this resolution indicates a commitment on <br />the Commission’s part to acquire property <br /> 3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.