My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-06-08 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
02-06-08 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2008 3:43:12 PM
Creation date
2/15/2008 3:37:17 PM
Metadata
Document Relationships
02-06-08 Redevelopment Commission Agenda
(Superseded by)
Path:
\Public\Redevelopment Commission\Agendas & Packets\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Rescheduled Regular Meeting –February 6, 2008 <br /> <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (CONT.) <br /> <br />F. Northeast Neighborhood Development Area <br /> <br />(1) continued… <br /> <br />Redevelopment Commission. The <br />Commission has already approved that. The <br />second is the lease anticipated to go from the <br />Redevelopment Commission to the developer <br />and it covers the terms discussed this <br />morning. <br /> <br />Mr. Peczkowski asked what would happen if <br />the developer decided after 25 years that it <br />didn’t want the garage because it was in need <br />of too many repairs. Mr. Inks responded that <br />an earlier form of the Development <br />Agreement contained an option for the <br />developer to own the garage. That option has <br />been removed and the developer must take <br />ownership of it after 25 years. <br /> <br />In Section 6.4, Kite agrees to dedications of <br />grants to provide the necessary rights of way <br />for construction of the streets. <br /> <br />Section 6.5 relates to a street maintenance <br />agreement. There are some streets where we <br />will be using public funds, such as to put in <br />Burns St.; but because of the way the hotel <br />juts out into Burns, the city doesn’t want to <br />be responsible for maintaining anything <br />related to that with public funds. <br />Responsibility for maintenance of that street <br />and any other similar improvement are being <br />assigned to the developer. <br /> <br />Sections 8.1(b) and (c) are sequential in their <br />timing. If the developer is late on a piece of <br />the project, there may be a development <br />delay fee attached to that. After three years <br /> 15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.