Laserfiche WebLink
30: <br />Board met in s�e istl i noes ion with the Park" Board at 7: 30 <br />P. M.'and property owners o a ve reef, <br />P. A. All members present, City Controller J A. Swygart acting as Chairma4 in <br />Mayor F. R:. Carson's place, Mayor F. R. Carson being absent from City, Mr, }W. W. <br />Ridenour member of the Park -Board absent., Mr. Fy J. _Anderson City Engineer <br />present. Meeting held in Vthe Common. Council chambersm City Hall. <br />Meeting called to order by the Chairman Mr. J. A. �wygart, Itr'2 30 <br />P. M. Park Board present at 7:50 P.M. <br />Chairman J. A. Swygart explained to parties present the purpose of this <br />m eet.ing which was called by the Mayor for the purpose of the -Park Board, property <br />own era on Calvert Street and the Board of Public Works ge!et ing together on Nimix <br />the paving of Calvert street through Studebaker Park, <br />Mr. Richard Elbel read. a. letter from the Board of Park Commissioners <br />in regard to pavinj Calvert Street' through Studebaker Park,( which letter is <br />hereinafter copied in full in this record' as follows:) After the read ink of this <br />letter by Mr. Richard Elbel the; Park Board immediately left the council room which <br />was at 6:10 P.M. <br />COPY of letter from Board of Park Commissioners. <br />° South Bend, Indiana. <br />Mr. Gilbert Elliott, <br />. April 23,1919. <br />Pros. Board sf Works, ° <br />Dear Sir ° <br />In respolise to your letter of April 19the, "wish to state that thi Park <br />Board, after a conference with the Mayoe, understood that he would call the:Board <br />of Works and of Parr Commissioners together to make'a coascientdaus effort o <br />iron out the matter'of the pavement of Calvert Street running through Stude"aker <br />Park. ° <br />At the request., of the Park Board one such meeting has already been <br />held at which you gave the Park Board certain assurances. The following night you <br />held the regular heiring, which was attended by'a.number of those living on Calvert <br />St. only. The Park hoard cannot ace any reason why those residents should again <br />'be called into this. ileet ing and it has `sibsolutely -ns desire to get into _ a personal <br />wrangles with they. ' <br />The Park Board looks upon this subject from the angle of the greater <br />good of all the C itvs rather than of the- res idents of one particular street. There <br />are many other res dents near Studebaker Park, we well as all over the City, who <br />are interested in this Park, as well in tie Parks generally. Some; of these, who <br />have been given lithe or no change to be heard on this subject, appeared before <br />the Park Board at a later evening, when the Msiyor Was present and vigorously <br />voiced their objections to cutting off this Park. ' In order to have fair play, the <br />Park Board wi-1-be,-perfectly willing to attend a special meeting, separately <br />from the one held 'April 23rd.,1919 of all people all over the City who have a right <br />also to voice their. objections. We mean by this not only citizens ' living in and <br />near Studebaker park but representatives business people and others interested in <br />s.ee ing South Bend built up as it should be --for . the larger good of all rather ths,n <br />for the residents of one street. By oth r representative people we refer to such <br />members as of the Chanber of Commerce, The Rotary Club, Kiwanis Club, the Women's <br />Clubs etc., These citizens must be all deeply interested because with the closing <br />of the saloons It becomes more imperative than a ver to develop* all Parks and play- <br />grounds. If we allow this street to be laid through Studebaker Park just because <br />those living thereon have been largely influenced by a few agitators to favor it, <br />why may not the residents pis elsewhere demand the opening street and thus cut, -our <br />-Parks all up.? We believe the residents on any street living near any Park should <br />raalizo. that these Parks belong to the City, and that they were purchased by the <br />City as a whole. That they have just as much right-- but no more than the <br />-t-it izMB _living in any other part of the City to' stay how they shall be improved or <br />cut up,' For instance residents near Howard or Leeper Park- night want to out streets <br />through those parks, becauset hey live near them. They would have as much right but <br />e then tho,eitizens living near Studebaker Park. <br />