Laserfiche WebLink
52(3 <br />Hearing had .on improvement resolution No. 630 for pipe sewer on <br />Fisher Street from ado Pherson Street to Chapin Street, -In the City of South Bend, <br />Indiana. <br />Upon said hearing remonstrators appeared bUt no,writt4n r# - monstrance, <br />was filed. And,the Board being fully advised in the premises, decides that the <br />0 <br />benefits to property liable to be assess'd for said improvements are equal to <br />the est;bnated cosi of the games, as reported by the City <br />Civil, Engineer, and there- <br />upon takes 'final action on said resolution 46 originally adoptod., and the same to <br />hereby to all thIngs -rat lfled, confirmed and approved.. <br />Resolved furtber, that notices be published on the, 29th.0 day oaf <br />March 1919 and on the '.5th day of April 1919.1n the <br />st&tihgLth&t' 9 0 South Bend Daily Tribune <br />In sai&City,1 this-BoardwIl roceive, bids for the construction of'said - <br />Improvement up to 10-:00 A.M. On the 15th. day of AprI11919 The 'Bo4rd:,resemes <br />the right to rejects any and all bids. <br />Hearing had on Impr6v6dent Revolution Ito. 621 for Pavement <br />on <br />Calvert, Street from Michigan Street to seat line of High Stroetv In' the City of <br />South.B#nd.1ndiana. <br />In the--abovemottor-labout fIfty interested property Owners appeared,, <br />unsalmously requesting that Improvement.be put In. No written remefis , trance.fllod. <br />The Board after hearing all_ Interested property ore 0 residing <br />On and owlag- pr oper ty <br />on said street, and belng dully advised In the promisee,, -decides that the benefits <br />to property liable to be asooso*d for said Improvomen-ts are equal tea the estimated <br />cost :of: %ha same, as "ported- by the City Civil -Engler, and thereupon taken - <br />finaL-4action on said r6seltitlon an modified: L Present - curbs to be retalned,,,-and the <br />some to hereby L in all tliinZi unanimously ratified conf Irmd and approved as modified. <br />Resolved further,, that notices be .published on the 29th.g,day of <br />Mareb,1919 and on the 5th.,,day of April 1919 In the South Bend Daily Tribune, <br />in said City, statingthat this Board will receive bids for the construct46n of <br />said improvements up-to,10:00 A.M. on the 15+,,h.9 dpy .ofApril1919. The. Board <br />reserves the right to reject any and all bids* <br />We member of the Park Board present at above hearing.) <br />The following Communication received read and placed on fil*, <br />Ron , Gilbert Elliott,, <br />Chairman BAadd of Public Works,, <br />South .Bend, Indiana:- <br />-My dear' Mr. Ell1ottL:- <br />Answering your verbal inquiry ,as to the status of the action • <br />, <br />Or ' 'actions takelk by the Board Comity COMMi ssion*re ogj f St. County with <br />roforence.to proposed Bridge on Calvert Streit In the City of f South Bend,,'I bog to <br />say. <br />,Sometime &g*9 I Cannot gIve the exact date withoutreferring. <br />to C*zni4#10Ue1rs records, In ' <br />response to a petition from a large number of citizens <br />and Board of Public Works in City of South Bend, the Beard 'of Commissinners 'adopted <br />.& dec,l ar&tsvl r*solutien.to build bridge, and referred the matter to the County <br />Engineer withc4astruotiene to prepare Plans andspecifications and report the <br />same <to the Board. <br />The County Engineer proceeded with this work until' it was <br />1RUM1414-04 -to him by Mr:.PerlOy, thatthe property an which he was supposed to <br />build:tbe bridge was Park property and that the park Board would not allow a <br />bridge to be constructed there. <br />Last Mondaytwo.memberg of the Park Board appeared before the, <br />Board Of Commissioners and stated -in a-ubstsaeo-, that they .denied the right ofthe <br />city to Open Calvert Street and also doled t1w PI-ght to the County to build a <br />Bridge. <br />The Board of Commissioners, otated that they didn't car* to go <br />ahead as dmake expense until the Park Board and Board of Public Works had Ironed out <br />bbeft differences. This was entirely Informal and is not a matter of record <br />to the'Coun 'EngLdeer <br />rocerd-establIshing.the Bridgo-andrefartAgg the matter <br />has ,never -been rose ided and. is. still An -f orce, <br />