My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/08/1919 Board of Public Works Special Meeting Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
1919
>
02/08/1919 Board of Public Works Special Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2024 12:24:27 PM
Creation date
2/19/2019 12:36:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
2/8/1919
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FEW <br />Board m*t in special secs ion at 10: 00 A.?A. All members present. <br />,This %e ng the d-*te set for deferred hearing on Pipe sewer on <br />Lindsey Street from Bla.ne Avenue to Portage Avenue, in the City of South Rend,, <br />Indiana, <br />Mr .; Ke.lie property owner y + <br />. y P . P y � .on Lindsey, Street appeared, before <br />the Board and the matter ojO a temporary connection to Portage Avenue sower was discussed, also the tpriva.te sewer connection Mr. M. Kelley claimed he has <br />with Qthe Garwood Property adjoingAg his on Lindsey Street.. He stated is he could <br />isake the.necessary co2nectian and repair in the private sewer between his and the <br />Garwood property it would-be unnecessary to Install a sewer in 'theis block. The <br />Board deferred this matter until Tuesday -February 18th. ,1919 at 10: 00 A.,M. until <br />thismatter could bd investigated. (Cape Guy L. Bunker present at said meeting, <br />still objected'to sewer'being constructed on Lindsey Street from Leland_Av*. to <br />{ Portage Avenue as he stated he had adequate sewer into Leland Avenue sewer. <br />As matters came up , before the Board relative to bills in the <br />State Legislature affecting the City of South Bend in ; 'contemplated improvements, <br />it was unanimously decidcdthytthe Board of Public Works should -go to Incaianapolis, <br />rind spend the necessary time to take up these matters with the Legislature.. The <br />expense of the different members to be paid by proper voucher of -the Board when a <br />proper voucher and itemized statement of expenses were filed. <br />City <br />The fallowing communication was presented by Attorney Thos, W. <br />Slick, same read and deferred indefinitely. <br />February 8th.,1919. <br />The Board of Public Works, <br />South Bend, Indiana. <br />Gentlemen: - <br />he Board of Pub1lc Works underthe formek admin.stra,t ion widened <br />Leer St. and condemned a, strip of land 20 ft. by 280 ft. off property belonging <br />to Mr. Talcott, and I hand you herewIth a penciled sktech showing the property <br />condemned. <br />Messrs. Rapp, Judie and Tohulka have appraised the damages as follows:- <br />290 ft. of sidewalk ,5ft. wide at 10cets per sq. foot. $140.00 <br />280 ft. of curb , at .15 per lineal foot 42.00 <br />30 large shade -trees destroyed 300.00 <br />Moving 280 ft. of iron fence i l 60.00 <br />20 ft. frontage on Vistula, Avenue 200 ft4i deep at <br />., 050,00 per front foot. 1000. 00 <br />80 ft. of front on Leer St. by 20 ft. deep at <br />$5.00 per front Moot � '. 40o.00 <br />Making a total 'of dama�es Appraised 1942.00 <br />The former Board of Works all®g ad -11113.50 and assessed benefits <br />in the sum of $80.00 making a total of damages to be paid to Mr. Talcott in the <br />sum of $ 1,033.50 <br />Mr. Talcott also states Chet a rustic house and a large quantity <br />of shubbery were necessarily destroyed byt he has made no claims for damages: f+or <br />these items. <br />Mr. Talcott appealed from a decision of the -Board of Public Works <br />she pleadings were argued and settled before the late Judge Fedd,in the St. Joseph <br />Superior Court, and afterwards the City took a change of venue to the Elkhart <br />Superior Court, where the case is now pending. I have had several conferences <br />wIth Mr. Talcott and Mr. Shively, his att#eney and also with Mr. Rapp and to -day <br />Mr. Talcott agreed to throw off $200.00 of the above claim and accept $19742.00 <br />in full settlement of the litigation. <br />011033-.50 has been paid in and, I am informed is now in the hands of <br />the`Count-y ,.reasurer, so that if this settlement should be made, it would be <br />necessary to appropriate $708.50, making a total of $1,742.00. I am of the opini©n <br />that the settlement is just, and should be made, and I am of further opInion that <br />it will be tke to the financial advantage of the City to make the settlement <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.