Laserfiche WebLink
PKk� <br />---* --* NEWS RELEASE < �- <br />Date: Thursday, July 12, 2012 <br />From: 2 District Council Member Henry Davis, Jr. Contact: 315 -4112 <br />"A Better Fellows Street Corridor Sought by Council" <br />On July 2, 2012, a Community & Economic Development Committee was held in the Council <br />Chambers on the Fellows Street Corridor Project. Our new City Engineer Mike <br />Meacham made a presentation to approximately forty (40) residents from the proposed area in <br />attendance, as well as to the Council Members and news media who were present <br />Today, the Board of Public Works, the Redevelopment Commission, our Mayor our City <br />Engineer and our Economic Development staff person are being sent the attached letter signed by more <br />than a majority of our City Council. Although the City Council does not have a direct level of <br />responsibility on the proposed project, it does have the opportunity to be a strong and vital voice for <br />the residents of our city. We are making the following requests: <br />1. That alternate routes and options be developed in a timely manner which are <br />respectful to the residents currently living in the Fellows Street area; and <br />2. That such alternate routes be developed in such a way that the law abiding <br />residents along Fellow Street who pay taxes would not have their homes taken <br />and therefore result in a significant loss of the tax base, as well having a <br />negative impact on the values of the homes which are left behind. <br />While viewing vistas to our golf course and bike paths are important, such items should not be a <br />priority over the rights of our residents who wish to live in their homes. <br />I have no doubt that creative Engineering plans can be developed which properly addressing traffic <br />which will be entering and exiting new interchanges. The City of South Bead has had and continues to <br />have distinguished & experienced Iicensed Professional Engineers who use their expertise to balance <br />the concerns we are highlighted. <br />We are therefore challenging the Department of Public Works and the Redevelopment Commission to <br />do better. It is unfair for the residents who may be potentially affected to be in limbo. We hope that <br />amicably solutions can be forthcoming no later than August 31, 2012. Thank you. <br />