Laserfiche WebLink
.In surd to comnlatlet're ceived from John :Hibberd about poles now standing <br />in the alley north of.Washington avenue between Taylor Street and William Street, the <br />X/ pole and wire inspector reports and recommends as follows and the same was approved by the <br />Board. _ <br />The Indiana & Michigan Elea. Co, he South Bend Home Tel. Company, <br />the Central Union Telephone Company should build their underground work.in-this alley <br />at once before the alley is paved. Each company should build hand holes between each <br />property so that wires con in the future be brought to the houses entirely underground <br />to allow this work to be done all poles now in use should be trenched jjN* into the <br />private property. <br />Cemetery Sexton Geo. M. 'Vrey appeared before the Board in regard to <br />an increase in wages tothe laborers in the City Cemetery. The Board ordered that an <br />increase io to +hirty cents (.30) per' hour should be granted to the laborers and <br />mowers in the City Cemetery. <br />Th following communications were received read and placed on, file. <br />Aug. 22nd. 1917. <br />Board of Public Works, <br />South Bend,, Ind. <br />Gentlemen: - <br />✓ I have examined the contract prepared by your Clerk for submission to the <br />White Construction Rompany covering the Mishawaka Avenue and Eddy Street improvement. <br />the same seems to be in proper form excepting that it is not dated, does not .contain <br />any clause stating when the work is to be completed, and it does not state whet brick <br />are to be used and the price of the same. <br />The Street railway Company agreed to pay for t#e space occupied by its <br />tracks only on condition that you cause said space'to be paved with Metropolitan brick or <br />some other equally as good brick. <br />I suggest that. you take it up with the Company and,see whether they will agree <br />that . that the brick stated .i--n tha White Construction Company's -bid is equally as good <br />as Metropolitan. And there should be such a finding in your minutes as to the brick bid <br />upon. <br />In the above opinion I have assumed that the engineering and construction data <br />are correct. <br />'ours very truly, <br />E. F. SEEBIRT, <br />Aug. 22nd. 1917, <br />Board of Public works, <br />South Bend, Ind., <br />Gentlemen: - <br />'our President has referred to me the notice heretofore served on the Chicago, <br />South Bend & Northern Indiana Railway Co., to repair pavements which their right of way <br />occupies. <br />Ordinance No. 696 granting the predecessor of said railway a franchise, and <br />all the subsequent franchises in effect, provides that said Company shall make repairs <br />and that upon failure to do the same after five days notice from said City to do so, the <br />Common Council shall have the right.to cause the removal of dirt, filth and obstruction <br />to be made and collect the cost from said Company. <br />Ordinance No. 871 provides that after give days notice to make repairs, the <br />Common Council shall have the right to cause said repairs and improvements to be made <br />and collect the cost from said Company. <br />This last Ordinance probably requires the Company to repair and enables the <br />City tomake the same upon failure of the City and collect the cost. <br />It is well settled that where a notice is required 1by law to be given to a <br />person to do a particular thing, the notice must be sufficiently definite to inform the <br />person what he is expected to do, and when he has completed the thing ordered to be done, <br />notice served on the Company orders it to repair the pavements on its right of way" that <br />need such repairs in the City of South Bend. <br />If this notice is ssuftie lent the C i#y might tear up the entire system <br />of the Company and recover the cost, and it does not give the Company an opportunity <br />to have determined whether a repair is in fact needed. <br />