My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-04-08 Personnel and Finance Standing Committee
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
2008
>
02-04-08 Personnel and Finance Standing Committee
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2008 1:41:11 PM
Creation date
2/14/2008 3:34:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
2/4/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Personnel and Finance Committee <br />February 4, 2008 <br />Page 2 <br />• Noted that HB 1001 does not cut fat, that it cuts deep into bone and muscle <br />• Reviewed the five (5) IACT suggested amendments to HB 1001 addressing levy <br />and spending limits, circuit breaker, control boards, public safety local option tax <br />(LOIT), and state intercept <br />In response to questions raised by Dr. Varner, Mayor Luecke stated that HB 1001 would <br />the "death to TI F". <br />In response to questions caised by Council Member Oliver Davis, Mayor Luecke stated <br />that there was not a fiscal analysis on costs savings if HB 1001 would be implemented <br />as proposed, noting that a few years ago the state Chamber of Commerce noted that <br />potential savings at that time were approximately 2°to. He noted that he did not see the <br />proposed 1-person county executive as weakening county operations. <br />Council President Rouse stated that some of the Kernan/Shepard proposals would <br />require constitutional amendments, and that others need ballot approval. Some have <br />voiced concern about the public input involved. <br />Mayor Luecke noted that Umbaugh of Indianapolis has provided some additional <br />background information and provided a copy (copy attached) The Mayor noted that Jim <br />Wensits did an article last year comparing Elkhart and St. Joseph Counties. <br />Dr. Varner stated that the state does an assessment each year, and that he would like <br />to see a comparison which they have done. <br />Mayor Luecke stated that he would get a copy of the state's assessment and share it <br />with the Council. In response to a question from Dr. Varner he did not believe that the <br />Umbaugh review looked at the number of not-for-profits in each county and what impact <br />that created. <br />The Mayor stated that in the short legislative session, phased in caps are being <br />discussed. He noted that basically the bill is a tax shift. The Mayor stated that he has <br />an excel template and would have it mailed to the Council. <br />Dr. Varner noted that the City must look at tax abatement going forward, noting that <br />Lake County was growing when the mills were operating, but without true growth it <br />would be difficult to maintain. Tourism also needs to be carefully reviewed. <br />Council Member Kirsits stated that hotel/motel needs to be reviewed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.