Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING November 12, 2018 <br /> the City. I would be happy to go through the booklet I provided in the Committee meeting(which <br /> is available in the City Clerk's Office)but, in the interest of brevity, it might make more sense if I <br /> ask if there are any additional questions. As Angela mentioned, we did agree to the commitment <br /> that no auto service repair would happen on site. <br /> Councilmember Gavin Ferlic opened the floor to questions from Council Members for the <br /> presenter or the petitioner. <br /> Councilmember Oliver Davis asked, Could you please share about your interaction with the <br /> neighbors and the people who had come to the Area Plan meeting who were in opposition? I think <br /> that would give good understanding of why there would be a change in our decision tonight from <br /> what Area Plan recommended. <br /> Mr. Studer stated, Thank you, Councilmember Davis. There were two (2) issues. One (1) is we <br /> met with Councilmember Davis and Councilmember Broden regarding the site plan and issues <br /> regarding road cuts, cut outs, etcetera. We did make some changes to the site plan. We moved the <br /> entrance on Douglas Road sixty (60) feet to the east so it went from one hundred forty (140) to <br /> two hundred (200) feet. That is part of the written commitments. We had five (5) neighbors, <br /> originally, that expressed some concerns at the Area Plan Commission. One (1) of them I <br /> mentioned was from North Liberty, one(1) was the owner of a competitor, and the other three(3) <br /> were in the neighborhood. We met with two (2) of those three (3) and they expressed no concern <br /> and also advised they would talk to the third (3rd) person as well. Their only concern was that we <br /> were not going to ask for substantial variances that would change the character of the <br /> neighborhood. We are not asking for any variances so they were satisfied and comfortable. <br /> Councilmember Oliver Davis interjected, And what you did with the Exxon sign, you said with <br /> the color? <br /> Mr. Studer replied, That was with the City's Department of Community Investment. Typically <br /> Exxon would have a lit up bright red sign. In order to keep with the character of the neighborhood, <br /> we have toned that down to keep with the current color scheme of brick and browns. So we have <br /> toned it down to meet the current standards of the neighborhood. We have agreed to do that, as <br /> well. By the way as a side note, we will be using a monument sign. No pylon signs will be used as <br /> that is more in character with the neighborhood. <br /> Councilmember Oliver Davis stated, Thank you for that, I appreciate it. <br /> This being the time heretofore set for the Public Hearing on the above bill, proponents and <br /> opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. <br /> None from the public wished to speak in favor of or opposition to this bill. <br /> Councilmember Oliver Davis made a motion to send Substitute Bill No. 56-18 to the full Council <br /> with a favorable recommendation. Councilmember Tim Scott seconded this motion which carried <br /> by a voice vote of eight(8) ayes. <br /> RISE AND REPORT <br /> Councilmember John Voorde made a motion to rise and report to full Council. Councilmember <br /> Regina Williams-Preston seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of eight (8) ayes. <br /> REGULAR MEETING RECONVENED <br /> Be it remembered that the Common Council of the City of South Bend reconvened in the Council <br /> Chambers on the fourth floor of the County-City building at 7:12 p.m. Council President Tim Scott <br /> presided with eight (8) members present. <br /> BILLS —THIRD READING <br /> There were no bills for third (3rd)reading at this time. <br /> 3 <br />