Laserfiche WebLink
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />RE: Tax Abatement for BLK, LLC <br />August 18, 2006 <br />Page 2 <br />Urban Enterprise Association. The department recommends that should the company receive the <br />UEZ designation, the Tax Abatement designation shall become null and void. <br />EMPLOYMENT IMPACT <br />Per the petition, it is estimated that the total project will create (2) two new, permanent, full-time <br />jobs representing a new annual payroll of $60,000. The project will also maintain (19) nineteen <br />existing, permanent, full-time jobs and (1) one existing, permanent, part-time job representing an <br />annual payroll of $830,000. <br />ABATEMENT QUALIFICATION <br />1. A review of the tax abatements previously granted finds that the petitioner has not been <br />associated with any previous tax abatements: <br />2. The Building Commissioner has reviewed the petition and finds the property to be properly <br />zoned for the proposed project. <br />3. A review of the South Bend Redevelopment designation areas finds that the property is located <br />in the Sample-Ewing Development Area, which is a Tax Incremental Allocation Area; therefore, <br />the petition for real property tax abatement must first be approved by the South Bend <br />Redevelopment Commission. <br />4. A review of the South Bend Urban Enterprise Zone finds that the property is located in the Urban <br />Enterprise Zone Area; therefore, it is recommended that should the company receive the UEZ <br />designation, the Tax Abatement designation shall become null and void. The Companymaynot <br />receive an economic revitalization area deduction if it receives an enterprise zone investment <br />deduction under I.C. 6-1.1-45 for the same property. <br />Although it qualifies fora (5) five-year abatement, the Redevelopment Commission staff <br />recommends a (3) three-year abatement based upon the type ofproject, which is improvement of <br />a vacant lot for outdoor storage of masonry products and no building construction. <br />6. A review of the Tax Abatement Ordinance No. 9394-03 finds that the petitioner does meet the <br />qualifications fora (5) five-year real property tax abatement under Section 2-83.1, Warehouse <br />Development in an Economic Development Target Area (EDTA), Urban Enterprise Zone (UEZ), <br />and Redevelopment Blighted Areas (RBA). <br />