Laserfiche WebLink
•CITY OF SOUTH BEND , OFFICE OF THE CLERK <br /> Committee Chair Williams-Preston replied, Well we can redact the name. <br /> Councilmember Scott replied, Well you can't, it's already out there. <br /> Committee Chair Williams-Preston replied, Your concern is noted. This isn't about shame and <br /> blame. I think that is kind of the point here because I've had these conversations with other Council <br /> Members. I believe people have seen this transcript before. I had conversations with Randy so it's <br /> about pulling the curtain back and understanding what is happening because part of talking about <br /> this is validating people's experience. So, ok, maybe we should or shouldn't have said the name <br /> but I think the key is here is he was actually directing, he says for example, `We'll go out one (1) <br /> day and cite [a property] for tall grass. We used to go cite it for tall grass and litter. Well, we'll hit <br /> it for tall grass one (1) day and come back the next day and hit it for litter and that's two (2) <br /> violations. If you do it in the same day it's one(1)violation. So people like that,that's why we are <br /> actually going after them aggressively,using the law—they use the law against us so we'll use the <br /> law against them. And that's who we target is those landlords that we can go after in that manner.' <br /> She went on, So, I think it's important we share that information especially since the next few <br /> pieces of evidence we talked about actually came from the owner of The Kick Back. Tyria Bailey <br /> spoke and she had shared her story with me. Again, she is in my District. She talked about how <br /> she had been targeted where she was being citied for illegal, well not illegal, but uncontrolled <br /> dumping that was not even on her property that was somewhere else. All of this started at once <br /> after she had a hearing of some kind. She wasn't even sure what the hearing was. So she told her <br /> story and it was quite compelling in my mind but, I guess, again, it is about recognizing how our <br /> practices affect our residents. I think I understand the idea behind aggressive Code Enforcement <br /> to force people to take responsibly and fix up their properties and things. As I understand it, our <br /> policies are written lawfully and legally, there are no illegal policies or anything like that. It is <br /> about practice. It is about understanding what we are doing in the field and making sure we are <br /> consistent. <br /> She continued, So these were some of the things and there are lots and lots of stories. We just had <br /> one(1)being shared that night but there are lots of stories about issues with Code Enforcement at <br /> that time. Again, what we wanted to do was really focus on how we make a shift. Now that we've <br /> been learning about these things, what can we do differently and what have we been doing <br /> differently? So one (1) of the problems was, as we mentioned with this data, the civil penalties <br /> were something that could roll into special assessments. A civil penalty is different from an <br /> ordinance violation. An ordinance violation is, for instance, if someone doesn't mow their lawn <br /> and the City mows it,they have to pay the City back for those costs and then some. A civil penalty <br /> is when, for instance, the City cites the property to fix the roof by a specific date and if it is not <br /> fixed by that date, the hearing judge can decide if a penalty is assessed. So there is no outlay of <br /> funds by the City but it is basically they were bad and you have to pay a fine. <br /> She went on, So what happened, in this particular area, was there was a time when civil penalties <br /> were around two hundred and fifty dollars ($250). But somewhere in there when we wanted to <br /> really address these issues to improve this particular area, there was a decision to change those <br /> civil penalties to more like $1,000, $2,000 or $3,000 a piece. It is not illegal. The unsafe building <br /> law says that you can fix a civil penalty through a hearing process, determined by a judge, for any <br /> amount between zero dollars($0) and $5,000. So what was being done was not illegal, to be clear <br /> EXCELLENCE ACCOUNTABILITY I INNOVATION I INCLUSION EMPOWERMENT <br /> 455 County-City Building 227W Jefferson Bvld South Bend,Indiana 46601 p 574.235.9221 f 574 235 9173 TTD 574.235.5567 www.southbendin.gov <br /> 4 <br />