My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-26-12 Council Agenda & Packet
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Common Council Agenda Packets
>
2012
>
03-26-12 Council Agenda & Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2012 12:05:47 PM
Creation date
3/22/2012 11:56:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4. Enforcement. The Employment Fairness ordinance (Bill 30-10) is enforceable "to the <br /> extent consistent with state law." (Section 2-131(i)(1)(B). The Commission would, therefore, <br /> investigate cases, make assessments of probable cause, and offer its conciliation services at no <br /> charge, (By the way, a great percentage of all Human Rights Commission probable cause <br /> cases are resolved in this manner.) The experience of Bloomington, Indiana (with a up rely <br /> voluntary ordinance), is that all probable cause claims since ordinance enactment in 1993 have <br /> been resolved satisfactorily through conciliation. <br /> Miscellaneous Matters in Kathv's Memo <br /> 1. Use of "Employment Fairness" in Bill Title but not within Ordinance. As mentioned <br /> previously, Bill 30-10 is simply an amendment to existing Article 9 of the South Bend Municipal <br /> Code known as the "Human Rights Ordinance." Inclusion of fairness in employment without <br /> regard to gender identity or sexual orientation is part of the broader category of"Human Rights." <br /> 2. Limitations. As previously noted, certain limitations to the Human Rights <br /> Commission's jurisdiction are mandated by state law and are included in the 1973 ordinance <br /> which are not repealed by Bill 30-10. The only other new limitation is the Boy Scout exception <br /> previously noted, and the clarification about employment benefits. <br /> 3. Definition of Employment_Discrimination. I have covered this previously. The 1973 <br /> ordinance did not define "employment discrimination" per se, consistent with the format of the <br /> Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Human Rights Commission applies the common law interpretation <br /> of employment discrimination as it has been doing in its work for nearly 40 years. <br /> 4. "In Employment" and "In the Matter of Employment" Distinguished. I explained this <br /> previously. The phrase "in the matter of employment" is used throughout the ordinance <br /> whenever needed to make clear that sexual orientation and gender identity are protected only <br /> "in the matter of employment" and not in the matters of housing or public accommodation. <br /> 5. Statement of Purpose and Intent. The statement of purpose and intent is used only to <br /> explain the Bill. It is not necessary to repeat language from this portion of the Bill in the Bill <br /> itself. <br /> 6. Definition of "Gender Identity". I covered this already. <br /> 7. Definition of "Sexual Orientation". I covered this already. <br /> 8. 3 Prong Standard. I believe Buddy Kirsits covered all of this quite well in his power <br /> point presentation, supplemented by Lonnie Douglas's statement about requests for assistance <br /> turned down by the Commission. <br /> 9. Human Rights Resolution. The Human Rights Resolution approving Bill 30-10 was <br /> properly passed in compliance with Open Door law requirements and is not subject to challenge <br /> on that basis after 30 days from passage. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.