Laserfiche WebLink
RESOLUTION `-C l r ( — <br />Bill No. 12- 12 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, <br />RECOMMENDING THAT THRESHOLDS AND CRITERA BE DEVELOPED WHEN PUBLIC <br />TAX DOLLARS ARE TO BE INVOLVED TO ASSIST IN <br />LEVERAGING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WITH THE PRIVATE SECTOR <br />Gh" last Fall, the South Bend Common Council adopted Resolution No. 4127 -11, <br />which encouraged collaboration between the City Administration, the Redevelopment <br />Commission and the Common Council in the interest of discussing possible options to assist in <br />attracting private investors to provide equity invest for the rehabilitation of the Chase Tower <br />located at 211 -213 West Washington in the heart of downtown South Bend; and <br />(Aar, the Council further notes that Bill No. 81 -11 which proposes financial <br />assistance for the Chase Tower is pending in the Council's Community and Economic <br />Development Committee and is scheduled for public hearing on February 27, 2012; and <br />GA)" Indiana state law sets forth the executive authority and the primary day -to -day <br />activities with the Mayor under Indiana Code § 36- 4 -4 -3; and the legislative authority of the city <br />is with the Common Council as set forth in Indiana Code § 36- 4 -4 -4; and <br />Qf)" the Council acknowledges that "City Plan" was adopted when Resolution No. <br />3657 -06 was adopted which addressed among other things an "Implementation Action Plan" <br />information on expanding economic opportunities; ensuring quality designs; planning and <br />analysis which are in the best interests of the city. <br />ga, &ALMAM, Term 4y do WOMM&A � way <br />as follows: <br />Section I. As discussions continue on what role, if any, the City of South Bend should <br />play with regard to potentially providing financial assistance to foster growth in downtown South <br />Bend, discussions of the following criteria or similar thresholds may be in the best interests of <br />the City: <br />1. Whether a dollar amount threshold should be established and upon that <br />amount being set, that additional criteria be used to assist in the evaluation <br />process for all potential developers on a specific project; <br />2. Identification of potential revenue stream(s) which may be under <br />consideration for assistance with the current balances of each, and the <br />proposed uses (short and long -term) for each being listed; <br />3. Analysis of the potential design/redesign, construction/reconstruction, <br />operation, management, or financing of the cost of the project; <br />4. Detailed identification of projection costs and the respective responsibilities <br />of all parties in any public - private partnership meeting the dollar threshold <br />addressed in ¶ 1; <br />5. Discussion of retaining any percentage of revenues received in the operation <br />and management; <br />