Laserfiche WebLink
RESOLUTION <br /> Bill No. 12- <br /> A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND,INDIANA, <br /> RECOMMENDING THAT THRESHOLDS AND CRITERA BE DEVELOPED WHEN PUBLIC <br /> TAX DOLLARS ARE TO BE INVOLVED TO ASSIST IN <br /> LEVERAGING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WITH THE PRIVATE SECTOR <br /> c last Fall, the South Bend Common Council adopted Resolution No. 4127-11, <br /> which encouraged collaboration between the City Administration, the Redevelopment <br /> Commission and the Common Council in the interest of discussing possible options to assist in <br /> attracting private investors to provide equity invest for the rehabilitation of the Chase Tower <br /> located at 211-213 West Washington in the heart of downtown South Bend;and <br /> the Council further notes that Bill No. 81-11 which proposes financial <br /> assistance for the Chase Tower is pending in the Council's Community and Economic <br /> Development Committee and is scheduled for public hearing on February 27,2012;and <br /> Nt Indiana state law sets forth the executive authority and the primary day-to-day <br /> activities with the Mayor under Indiana Code § 36-4-4-3; and the legislative authority of the city <br /> is with the Common Council as set forth in Indiana Code §36-4-4-4;and <br /> the Council acknowledges that"City Plan" was adopted when Resolution No. <br /> 3657-06 was adopted which addressed among other things an "Implementation Action Plan" <br /> information on expanding economic opportunities; ensuring quality designs; planning and <br /> analysis which are in the best interests of the city, <br /> as follows: <br /> Section I. As discussions continue on what role, if any, the City of South Bend should <br /> play with regard to potentially providing financial assistance to foster growth in downtown South <br /> Bend, discussions of the following criteria or similar thresholds may be in the best interests of <br /> the City: <br /> 1. Whether a dollar amount threshold should be established and upon that <br /> amount being set, that additional criteria be used to assist in the evaluation <br /> process for all potential developers on a specific project; <br /> 2. Identification of potential revenue stream(s) which may be under <br /> consideration for assistance with the current balances of each, and the <br /> proposed uses(short and long-term)for each being listed; <br /> 3. Analysis of the potential design/redesign, construction/reconstruction, <br /> operation,management,or financing of the cost of the project; <br /> 4. Detailed identification of projection costs and the respective responsibilities <br /> of all parties in any public-private partnership meeting the dollar threshold <br /> addressed in 11; <br /> 5. Discussion of retaining any percentage of revenues received in the operation <br /> and management; <br /> 6. Discussion of capital outlay costs and the interest and principal repayment; <br /> 7. Discussion of the costs associated with operation, management and <br /> maintenance; <br />