Laserfiche WebLink
7 <br />with the Passive Park being created, there is no primary structure. The <br />improvements shown on Parcel "B" are considered accessory structures by <br />the Ordinance, even though these are typical improvements within a park. <br />The Petitioners do not believe there would be an adverse impact on any <br />surrounding property if the requested Variance were approved. <br />The second Variance request is from the requirement of providing <br />required perimeter landscaping of one (1) deciduous tree at a minimum <br />spacing of 40 feet on- center along the North, East, South and West <br />property lines to being allowed to use the existing landscaping. The <br />Park as shown has extensive landscaping located throughout the site <br />including shrubs, grasses, vines, ground cover and perennials. The <br />Petitioners believe the park site as designed meets the intent of the <br />City Ordinances with regards to site landscaping. <br />The third Variance request is from providing the minimum required <br />three (3) parking spaces for the existing passive park to providing no <br />parking spaces. The Petitioners would state that the intent of this Park <br />is to be passive in nature, and was designed to be enjoyed by <br />pedestrians using the trail system along Oliver Plow Court. For the few <br />occasions where a Park user would drive to the site, the Petitioners do <br />not have a concern if the Park users park in front of their building on <br />Parcel "A ". The Petitioners do not believe approval of this Variance <br />would have a negative impact on any adjacent property. <br />The fourth Variance request is from the maximum allowed height of <br />150 ft. for structures to a maximum height of 194 ft. for an existing <br />smoke stack. The Petitioners as stated above are reconfiguring the <br />parcels to create a separate park site and since the smoke stack is <br />being placed on the new parcel, a Variance is required for the height of <br />the structure. The Petitioners would ask for approval of this Variance, <br />as it would not adversely affect any surrounding property. <br />The fifth Variance request is from the minimum required 10 ft. Side - <br />yard setback along the West property line to 0 ft. for the existing <br />structure connecting the shown existing smoke stack and the existing <br />primary building located on Parcel "A ". This request is to allow for the <br />connecting structure between the smoke stack and the original building <br />on Parcel "A" to remain. The approval of this Variance will not have a <br />negative impact on any adjacent property. <br />The sixth Variance request is from the minimum required 10 ft. Side - <br />yard setback along the South.property line to a minimum of 0.10 ft. for <br />an existing trellis structure and pavers and to a minimum of 9 ft. for <br />an existing smoke stack. This Variance is required to allow for the <br />reconfiguration of the common lot line between Parcels "A" and "B ". The <br />boundary was created based on the location of existing improvements on <br />each parcel. The adjacent property to the East is owned by the City of <br />South Bend and is presently vacant. The approval of this Variance would <br />have no adverse impact on any surrounding property. <br />The last Variance request is from the minimum required lot width and <br />frontage of 150 ft. on a public street to a minimum of 123.05 ft. more <br />or less. This request is needed to allow for the reconfiguration of the <br />parcels. The lot was originally platted prior to the creation of the <br />