My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-08-18 Zoning and Annexation
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
2018
>
Zoning and Annexation
>
10-08-18 Zoning and Annexation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2018 6:36:48 PM
Creation date
10/22/2018 6:36:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
10/8/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF SOUTH BEND I OFFICE OF THE CLERK <br /> Mayflower Road east and draw a line across the bypass there too. They contacted us and I had no <br /> interest in doing it. I asked what is coming. What do you have in mind? What do you want to <br /> attract? They couldn't tell me anything. But, they wanted to discuss it in one (1) or two (2) days <br /> and told me about how they have to get it done by the end of this year. Nothing good has ever <br /> come by rushing anything. Like I said earlier, the Synders, Blads and us have all been there for a <br /> hell of a long time. Ceres just bought the ground two (2) or three (3) years ago. They are new to <br /> the neighborhood. And this is a neighborhood. This takes into consideration all of South Bend <br /> because when the Ethanol Plant came, yeah it was a west side thing but it stunk up everything all <br /> the way to Granger. So I would agree to this if they can change to Light Industrial or Commercial. <br /> If something big came,we would have adequate time to get all neighbors involved in that meeting <br /> to voice their concerns. As it stands, again, I would like you to oppose this if it stays GI because it <br /> is way too vague. I understand there is railroad spur and all that but zone it light and if something <br /> comes that wants to use the railroad spur that is heavy industrial, have them come back and have <br /> them tell us and the neighbors what that plan is. <br /> Mr. Matthys continued, And I don't think the City is being very transparent on what they may <br /> have in mind or what somebody has inquired. They are wanting to do this voluntary annexation <br /> but why they are all calling all the neighborhood farmers to see if we would voluntarily annex in, <br /> I don't know. Progress is great but rushing is not. I hope both petitioners can get it changed to <br /> Light Industrial or Commercial for tonight's meeting. I think that would appease a lot of the area. <br /> One (1)thing I did notice is the man in the blue shirt talked about drainage and that we can't just <br /> dump drainage down ditches anymore. The Ethanol Plant did that in 1985 and I know that was a <br /> long time ago. But I also own land out on the west side of St. Joseph County where we just got the <br /> Gasification Plant and that dumps 13 million gallons per day down a ditch that the County <br /> Drainage Board has not done a darn thing about to improve.And I'll tell you one(1)thing,Portage <br /> Prairie is high ground. That is sand. They don't have a drainage issue. We are mud. The ground <br /> out there is on mud. When you talk about dumping water, we are thinking this is our livelihood. <br /> This is how I go and make money. I where this blue shirt to work every day and I bust my butt out <br /> there farming and I don't need to take care of somebody else's darn water that is going to flood <br /> my ground. So, again, GI, we have no control over it. Light Industrial, we will have a say in the <br /> future and hopefully there won't be a water issue because we sit at the lowest and best ground in <br /> St. Joseph County. <br /> Committee Chair Davis gave the floor to the petitioners for rebuttal. <br /> Mr. Corcoran replied, I just want to say to the drainage issue, again, it is part of the engineering. <br /> Every project we go through, all the storm water and all of that must be retained on site. You can't <br /> compact other sites. There is an EPA mandate that doesn't allow us to put storm water into the <br /> sewer and so it has to be taken care of on site in that regard. So, whatever happens in the future <br /> must take care of storm water on site. It is the way it is. Every Light Industrial, General Industrial, <br /> Commercial or any other site that comes in must take care of that. And in terms of putting water <br /> into the Kankakee River, I think that is not a zoning issue. That is an EPA issue. <br /> Committee Chair Davis stated, I would say, in closing and before we go to a vote, I agree that <br /> while there are different issues you just shared regarding the drainage,those of us that live out that <br /> way, after experiencing, and some of you were on the board, some of you weren't,but everybody <br /> heard it in the news, but when you come down to flooding and muck issues, we all who live out <br /> there,we went through it just recently.Then you have the potential of,you never know,the Ethanol <br /> EXCELLENCE I ACCOUNTABILITY I INNOVATION I INCLUSION I EMPOWERMENT <br /> 455 County-City Building 1227 W.Jefferson Bvld I South Bend,Indiana 466011p 574.235.92211f 574.235.91731TTD 574.235.5567 www.southbendin.gov <br /> 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.