Laserfiche WebLink
136. <br />Board met in regulai session at 10: 00 A.M. dr. G. A. Elliott <br />abaen.t. Mr. H. P. Rostiaer Vicar Presidon.t Acting President. <br />The Board instructed Clerk to notify David Westburby of the <br />W. H. Burke Plumbing Company to be present at the n*xt regular meeting August <br />27th.91919 at 10:00 A.M. tQ take up matter of repiede.ljxg hattir;g for new room in <br />office of the Board <br />The Board instructed the City tnginear to have the Contractor <br />ropy** 4n.y defective curb along Olive Street at once at the same price bid in <br />co4tract`,for the Olive Street pavement improvement* <br />The contract for Trunk Sawar o� Diamond Avenue wader Improvement <br />T n toproveme <br />Reasolut on No. 700 was awarded to L. g. "Mobster �t........... $27-690.00 <br />< <br />The following communication <br />to the lett in.g of the above contract and same <br />nd agreements were f iled 6l regard <br />re approved by the Board, <br />- t> <br />August 25t1a. ,1919. <br />Witcomb Keller, < <br />South Be d, Indiana <br />Gentlemen:" <br />I am herewith enclosing contract for L waiver for filing before the Bead <br />Board of �Publie World in, the matter of the Diamond Ave$us Truak Sewer System under <br />Res#lution No. 700.. <br />I fool very cure that if your firm will execute this waiver and file <br />vlte same bsf'ore the Berard of Public warka, and titat if the work is thereafter done <br />that youf will be *stopped fro :;aestioxixg the legality of the ass*ssmen.ts because <br />of the defects referred" to in the waiver. <br />It has Veen held 1h Zorn vs Warner SchLarf, etc. Co. 42 Ind. App. 213; <br />Men.zi*. vs Greensburg, 42 Ind. ;App. 6r; and Ross vs Stackkauso,114 Ind. 20- that; k <br />the matters of aeceptissg or !re ject iugbide, and letting the contract are purely adch <br />administrative in +aractor; and that if the stIlity <br />ute is not followed in then* <br />particulars that the contract is not void, but merely vendable, and that- if the <br />property owners stabd'by and consent to the makg of than improvemexts that they <br />are hereafter estoppod from question lag the lethereof. <br />Th.*re are many otbh�!r Indiana authors ies to the sate affect that where <br />& propert<y owaer consents to the making efl an Improvement and wkere tke contractor <br />spends a large amount of money in the making of tke same add he makes the improvement <br />without any objection from the property owner t .rat he car, collect the assessments. <br />I herewith enclose the contracts w.h ch you requested, <br />YOURS VERY TRULY, <br />ELI F. SEEBIRT. <br />