Laserfiche WebLink
:®CITY OF SOUTH BEND I OFFICE OF THE CLERK <br /> Councilmember Broden followed up, And you had chosen a flat rate over the alternative method? <br /> Mr. Horvath replied, Correct and that was mostly for the ease of implementation. The more <br /> complicated the system is, the more money would be spent on billing and billing processes and <br /> that would mean less money that actually goes into capital. Since we are starting at a lower rate, it <br /> would be best to keep it simple and use that money on capital projects.Again,the money generated <br /> is going to go into capital projects and related services. It will not go into offset costs of folks <br /> cleaning sewers or sweeping streets. <br /> Councilmember Broden then asked,And the South Bend Dam project, how does that relate to the <br /> storm water issue? I thought it had nothing to do with the flooding. <br /> Mr. Horvath replied,No, it doesn't do flood control. That is typically where you pay for any dam <br /> repairs is from storm water fees because it is managing water that is going through the City. There <br /> is no Dam Fund. The Dam is either an asset or a liability but, really, it's both. It is something we <br /> have to maintain otherwise it breaks and then it is gone. We have to do minor maintenance on it <br /> and that is what the funding is for. <br /> Councilmember Teshka stated, A lot of what I'm hearing from residents is that we are already <br /> paying too much. So I would like some clarification on the difference between what you pay for <br /> with water usage and this new storm water. So if I'm just a resident and I'm looking at it, it is just <br /> water. There are a lot of us that wouldn't mind paying an extra twenty four dollars ($24) a year to <br /> ensure we have proper ways to manage storm water better. Obviously with residents on a fixed <br /> income, that may be harder to encumber. This fee also doesn't factor into the EPA and their <br /> guideline on our water rate should be in ratio to our low and fixed income folks, correct? <br /> Mr. Horvath replied, What you are alluding to is our financial capability analysis and what that <br /> does is it looks at a number of different factors in our community's ability to pay. One(1)of those <br /> factors is comparing the percentage of the bill to the median household income. At a point where <br /> the bill gets above two percent (2%) of the median household income, they call that the point of <br /> severe economic burden. What that does is it doesn't give you a break but typically they give a <br /> longer period of time to do these programs. They'll typically start with saying we want you to <br /> solve this CSO issue in a ten(10)year period,but because you have high burden,we will give you <br /> fifteen (15) or twenty (20) years to do it. Our current consent decree is a twenty (20) year plan <br /> because we were at high burden. We were somewhere around three point seven percent(3.7%) of <br /> the median household income. That is not the only indicator but that is a significant one (1). With <br /> the new plan at $200 million, we are still at burden. We are just over two percent (2%). We are <br /> right around two percent (2%) so we are still at the high burden. If you added a storm water fee, <br /> we would include that as part of the financial capability analysis because it is an associated fee we <br /> can include in that calculation. We don't include drinking water but we include storm water <br /> because they are related. <br /> Committeemember Voorde asked, How much does twenty four dollars ($24) a year generate for <br /> capital improvements? <br /> EXCELLENCE I ACCOUNTABILITY I INNOVATION I INCLUSION I EMPOWERMENT <br /> 455 County-City Building 1 227 W.Jefferson Bvld I South Bend,Indiana 466011 p 574.235.9221 If 574.235.9173 TTD574.235.55671 www.southbendin.gov <br /> 5 <br />