My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
18-56 Petition of the Area Board of Zoning Appeals for the property located at 340 E Colfax Ave
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Upcoming Bills
>
2018
>
09-24-2018
>
18-56 Petition of the Area Board of Zoning Appeals for the property located at 340 E Colfax Ave
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2018 2:15:41 PM
Creation date
9/19/2018 2:15:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Resolutions
City Counci - Date
9/24/2018
Bill Number
18-56
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
This requirement is in the Ordinance, but it as envisioned for buildings being placed along major public <br /> streets. This site has Ghttz Avenue as the public street. The owners are presently in discussions to decide <br /> whether to vacate a portion of this public street which would have it end at the south line of of the lot <br /> containing the Stephenson Mills Apartment building. If that happens the requested variance would not be <br /> needed. But as of now this public street exists and the buildings proposed are visible from it. To be <br /> conservative it was decided to request the variance now. The requested variances should not have a <br /> detrimental effect on the public's health, safety or welfare. <br /> (c) The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a <br /> substantially adverse manner; and: The proposed project will be used as a public park. The site presently <br /> is used as a park. Approval of the requested variances for this project should not adversely affect any <br /> surrounding property. <br /> (c) The strict application of the terms of this Ordinance would result in practical difficulties in the use of the <br /> property: In this case, the Petitioners would note that they have attempted to mitigate the proposed <br /> variance for the side yard building setback They believe their solution does meet the intent of the City's <br /> Ordinances. For the height of the faVade visible from the public street, the Petitoners believe they have <br /> explained the uniqueness of the site and the placement of the buildings. They have also noted that at a <br /> point in the future a portion of the public street may be vacated which would make the one variance un- <br /> necessaty. This small side street is used minimally by the public. The Petitioners do not believe approval <br /> of any requested variance in this Petition will have a negative impact on any surrounding property or be <br /> detrimental to the existing neighborhood. <br /> SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE INFORMATION(if the petition does not include a Special Exception Use,please <br /> skip to next section): <br /> 1) The Special Exception Use(s) being requested : Private Hydro-dam Electric Utility Facility. <br /> 2) A statement on how each of the following standards for the granting of a Special Exception Use is met: <br /> (a) The proposed use will not be injurious to the public health, safety, comfort, community moral standards, <br /> convenience or general welfare: The placentent of the proposed facility will be beneath the proposed <br /> iniproventenis for Seitz Park as shown on the attached site plan. This proposed facility is intended to <br /> supply additonal electric power to the Unitsity of Notre Dame Campus as a sustainable supply of clean <br /> power. The placement of the facility should have no deterintentrial effect on the public, community or <br /> surrounding properties. <br /> (b) The proposed use will not injure or adversely affect the use of the adjacent area or property values <br /> therein: As mentioned above, the proposed facility will be placed under the proposed park improvements. <br /> This use is compatible with its location to the St. Joseph River. Its placentent should not have an adverse <br /> affect on the proposed park improvements, or the adjacent mired uses of contmercial facilities, and <br /> residential uses or the East Race Waterway. <br /> (c) The proposed use will be consistent with the character of the district in which it is located and the land <br /> uses authorized therein;and: The proposed private hydro-dam electric facility is consistent within the <br /> district as the site is located along the St.Joseph River. This is needed to supply the proposed use with the <br /> resource to run the facility. This 1}pe of use is typically located along a waterway curd specially-where <br /> there already is an existing dam structure. <br /> (d) The proposed use is compatible with the recommendations of the City of South Bend Comprehensive <br /> Plan. The proposed use is not specifically noted in the City's Comprehensive Plan, but due to the type of <br /> use, its location would most likey be considered appropriate for the City Plan. This use is consistent with <br /> the historical use of this section of the St.Joseph River to supply energy to the nearby entities. <br /> * In the case of a Special Exception Use,the petitioner shall be held to the representations ma e on°tlWe k6'lirh-inar° <br /> Site Plan included with this petition. <br /> SEP I 42018 i <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.