Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING August 13, 2018 <br /> district is intended to highlight the natural and agricultural amenities, and they include such things <br /> as vineyards, buffalo paddocks,petting barns,tobogganing hills, and other attractions that may be <br /> a part of the larger vision for the development. There are some existing written commitments on <br /> the property that have to do with a traffic study, which is common for a project of this size. This <br /> comes to you from the Area Plan Commission with a favorable recommendation. Utilizing the <br /> planning and development will allow for a large mixture of uses at this site and a development that <br /> will generate a lot of attraction for the City of South Bend. <br /> Brian McMorrow, Abonmarche Consultants, 750 Lincoln Way East, South Bend, IN, served on <br /> behalf of the petitioner of this bill. Mr. McMorrow stated, We were retained by SBCC <br /> Development Corp,the South Bend Chocolate Company entity set up for real estate development, <br /> led by Mark Tamer. Mark has big plans and big visions for this eighty(80) acre piece of property. <br /> South Bend isn't big enough in its current configuration, so we need to annex in about thirteen <br /> (13) more acres to make it happen. <br /> This being the time heretofore set for the Public Hearing on the above bill, proponents and <br /> opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. <br /> None from the public wished to speak in favor of or opposition to this bill. <br /> Councilmember Karen White made a motion to send Bill No. 26-18 to the full Council with a <br /> favorable recommendation. Councilmember John Voorde seconded the motion which carried by <br /> a voice vote of nine (9) ayes. <br /> 33-18 PUBLIC HEARING ON AN ORDINANCE OF <br /> THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br /> SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, AMENDING THE <br /> ZONING ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING <br /> HISTORIC LANDMARKS STATUS FOR THE <br /> STRUCTURE AND REAL PROPERTY KNOWN <br /> AS THE CIVIL RIGHTS HERITAGE CENTER <br /> FORMERLY THE ENGMAN NATATORIUM, <br /> AND LOCATED AT 1040 WEST WASHINGTON <br /> STREET, IN THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, <br /> INDIANA <br /> Councilmember Oliver Davis, chair of the Zoning and Annexation Committee, reported that they <br /> met this afternoon and send this bill forward with a favorable recommendation. <br /> Adam Toering, the Department of Community Investment, with offices on the 14th Floor of the <br /> County-City Building, South Bend, IN, served as the presenter of this bill. Mr. Toering stated, I <br /> am here to present to you a landmark for the Civil Rights Heritage Center. The structure was built <br /> in 1922 and is a neoclassical design building by Walter W. Schneider, who was a local architect. <br /> Landmarking was previously investigated by the Commission as well as the community in the late <br /> 1990's and then again revisited in 2003. It was not pursued at that time. The current owner, the <br /> South Bend Heritage Foundation, supports this...and they are committed to actively preserving <br /> and protecting the historic fabric of our community. Local landmarks are sold and bought <br /> regularly, so that is not an impediment to the process of this structure or the future use of this <br /> structure. <br /> Georger Garner, 112 Franklin Place, South Bend, IN, served as the presenter of this bill. Mr. <br /> Garner stated, It is hard to underestimate the importance of the former Engman Public Natatorium <br /> in the historic record of the City of South Bend. Between 1922 and 1936,those who were allowed <br /> to come into the building did so by passing under the word"public" carved into the concrete at the <br /> front of the building. In spite of the fact that African-Americans had always been in the City and <br /> at this time were moving into the City in record numbers,between 1922 and 1936,the Natatorium's <br /> caretakers—all of whom were white—denied entry to African-Americans. As a City-owned and - <br /> operated supposedly public pool, this became one (1) of several places of activity where we as a <br /> City began choosing what kind of City we want to be. Are we one (1) that wishes to believe that <br /> word"public" is one (1)that includes every human being? Or are we one (1)that believes that it's <br /> 6 <br />