Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />running from Gagnon Street on the south to the North property line. The <br />Petitioners would ask to be not required to provide perimeter <br />landscaping of one deciduous tree at a minimum spacing of 40 feet on- <br />center along the East, North, West and South property lines. The <br />Petitioner would state that there has been no such landscaping since <br />they have owned the property and that approval of this Variance would <br />not have a detrimental affect on surrounding properties. They plan to <br />keep the existing trees and vegetation that are presently on-site. Most <br />of this landscaping is on the West side of the site with some along the <br />Southwest side as well. The Petitioner would note that along the North <br />property line there is an existing building that has a fagade with no <br />windows and only two steel doors. They do not believe landscaping or <br />screening would have an impact in this area, that would be of benefit to <br />this adjacent owner. The Petitioner would state that in order to create <br />a buffer along the North portion of their East property line, where a <br />major portion of the outside storage will be located, they are planning <br />to create an evergreen screen on a small berm. This should create an <br />effective buffer between the proposed storage area and the adjacent <br />property owner to the East. The Petitioner would hope that this new <br />landscaping meets the intent of the ordinance and that approval of this <br />Variance would not have a detrimental affect on surrounding properties. <br />The Petitioner believes that approval of the above Special Exception and <br />Variances for this proposed and existing use will not be detrimental to <br />adjacent properties, nor will it adversely affect the surrounding <br />property values. <br />The Petitioner would ask the Board Members to agree that approval of <br />the above described Special Exception and Variances will not have a <br />detrimental affect for this area, nor would the property values, <br />public s health, safety, morals, or general welfare be adversely <br />affected. <br />The Petitioners contend that the strict application of the terms of <br />the Zoning ordinance will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship <br />as applied to the property for which the Variances and Special Exception <br />are sought: that the need for the Variances and Special Exception arises <br />from such condition peculiar to the property in the same Zone: and that <br />the use or value of the area adjacent to the property described in the <br />petition for the Variances and Special Exception will not be injurious <br />to the public health, Safety, morals, or general welfare of the <br />community. <br />I attest, under the pens ies for perjury, that the foregoing <br />representati ar rue <br />Michael J. Danc _ <br />President <br />Danch, Harner & Associates, Inc. <br />