My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9654-06 Rezoning 505 E. Ireland, 4412 Fellows, and 4422 Fellows St. - District 5
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Ordinances
>
2006
>
9654-06 Rezoning 505 E. Ireland, 4412 Fellows, and 4422 Fellows St. - District 5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/26/2007 1:47:30 PM
Creation date
12/26/2007 1:46:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Ordinances
City Counci - Date
2/27/2006
Ord-Res Number
9654-06
Bill Number
93-05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5 Criteria (per IC 36-7-4-603): <br />1. Comprehensive Plan: <br />Policy Plan: <br />Goal 2: Objective B: Locate employment uses in such a manner that conflicts with <br />residential land uses are minimized. <br />Goal 2: Objective B: Policy I: Fashion a land use plan that ensures physical separation <br />and/or buffering between employment and residential uses. <br />The petition is in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Land Use Plan: <br />The petition area is designated as a Commercial Growth Area by the Land Use Plan. <br />The petition.is_consistent_with the Land_Use. Plan.- - - <br />2. Current conditions and character: <br />The petition area is adjacent to an established single family residential neighborhood. <br />3. Most desirable use: <br />The most desirable use would be for those uses allowed in the "OB" Office Buffer or "O" Office <br />district in order to buffer the residential neighborhood from the commercial areas to the south <br />and west. <br />4. Conservation of property values: <br />Residential property values could be adversely affected should the rezoning be approved. <br />~. Responsible development and growth: <br />It is not responsible development and growth to allow a residential neighborhood to be intruded <br />upon by a zoning designation that allows such a high intense incompatible retail land use. <br />Recommendation: <br />Based on information available prior to the public hearing the Staff recommends that this be sent <br />to the Common Council with an unfavorable recommendation. <br />Analysis: <br />This rezoning would conflict with Goal 2, Objective B of the Comprehensive Policy Plan. The <br />rezoning allows high intensity commercial uses that would be in conflict with the northern <br />established single-family neighborhood. This residential neighborhood would be better protected <br />by either leaving the property zoned single-family or zoning it to one of the office zoning <br />districts. <br />City of South Bend Redevelopment Commission, et al <br />#2356-OS <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.