Laserfiche WebLink
Improve South Bend's quality of life to ensure that every resident and every family can <br />earn an adequate income; secure adequate housing; live in a safe, pleasant and humane <br />neighborhood; enjoy a wide range of social, cultural and recreational opportunities; and <br />have access to quality educational and medical services within an excellent natural and <br />manmade environment. <br />GOAL D: Trust in City Government <br />Improve residents' trust in City government to ensure that South Bend has a broad base of <br />consensus and support on which to build the future; a strong foundation for collaborative <br />action and community partnerships; and an increase in resident and customer <br />participation in the daily public life of the community. <br />GOAL E: The City's Responsiveness, Efficiency, and Effectiveness <br />Improve the responsiveness, efficiency and effectiveness of City government to ensure <br />that the City's customers get the value they expect and deserve. <br />GOAL F: The City's Infrastructure <br />Improve the City's infrastructure to ensure that South Bend can support physical growth <br />and economic development; and offer an excellent quality of life to all of its residents and <br />other customers. <br />GOAL G: The City's Financial Condition <br />Improve the financial condition of City government to ensure that South Bend has the <br />financial resources necessary to achieve all its goals for the next five years, <br />GOAL H: The City's Workforce <br />Improve the City government's existing workforce, work environment and human <br />development systems to ensure that South Bend has the human resources necessary to <br />achieve all its goals for the next five years. <br />The logic models contained in this publication represent the City's third year of utilizing this <br />measurement process. Outcome measurement assumes that all benchmarked data (outputs and <br />outcomes) will elicit continual discussion of each and every program. It is the hope of all who <br />have invested time and energy into the development of outcome measurement for the City that <br />this process will not only make performance based budgeting more useful but that it will also <br />qualitatively enrich the lives of the City's residents. <br />Following this introduction is a table of contents for this section which has been included to <br />provide easy access to specific department logic models. The table of contents is followed by a <br />citywide organizational chart which provides an overview of all city functions. The remainder of <br />this section is divided by department. Each department begins with an organizational chart and <br />then is followed by program budgets. These budgets are summarized by major budget <br />classification (first by funding source and then by individual program) and include both 2005 and <br />2004 budgets as well as 2004 and 2003 actual costs for comparative purposes. Logic models for <br />all programs follow their respective program budget summaries. <br />C~4 <br />