My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006 Performance Based Budget
sbend
>
Public
>
Finance
>
Budgets
>
2006
>
2006 Performance Based Budget
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2014 10:58:02 AM
Creation date
12/19/2007 10:33:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
532
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
elizninated in this year's budget. Traditionally, the City prepares a conservative budget which <br />igcludes the assumption that all persom~el positions are filled for the entire year. This is an <br />important assumption to note since perso~el costs {salary and benefits) represent 50.6% of the <br />tota12006 Operating & Capital Budget. <br />The remaining portion of this summary identifies significant items and/or highlights that are worth <br />noting when reviewing the City's 2006 Budget. These commerrts are intended to help the reader <br />better understand the opportunities and challenges faced by the City Administration when <br />developing this budget. <br />• This year's revenue budget reflects a 3.9 percent property tax levy increase for the <br />civil city fiords. Starting in 2003, assessed valuations for all cities state wide converted <br />their assessed values from 33 percent to 100 percent or market value. This conversion <br />will have no effect on total dollars. Assessed values will increase and tax rates will <br />decrease. The purpose of this conversion is to have assessed values equal true tax <br />value. <br />• General Fund revenue, when excluding property taxes, is anticipated to increase by <br />$1,126,021 {7.9%). Payment in Lieu of Taxes (which is paid by South Bend Water <br />Works and Sewage Works to the General Fund) reflects an increase of $248,612 or <br />9.6%. Fees collected from the County for EMS services {recorded as revenue) have <br />increased b3' $35,520 (2%) refleetiIIg the increased cost for that service. Revernie from <br />the Palais Royale Ballroom Center is projected to be $450,240, this is an increase of <br />$5,240 (1.2%). The Ballroom expenses decreased by $24,034 (-4.3%). The Balhoozn's <br />operational deficit is budgeted to be $80,232 ~ 2006. This operational subsvdy is funded <br />by the General Fund. <br />• Increased personnel casts ~ 2006 include an overall average increase in base salary of <br />2.5% for all Police Officers {first of a three year contract), an average increase of 2% for <br />all Firefighters (first of three year contract). Both Police and Fire contracts were <br />negotiated in 2005. A 4.3% base pay increase for the Teamsters (fourth year of four year <br />contract) and salary increases for non-bargaining employees of 2.0°10 {with some <br />exceptions identified in the salary ordinance). <br />• The number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees has decreased by 6 FTEs from last <br />year's budget. In the recent budgets the City has tried to cut expenditures by <br />consolidating positions where appropriate. The City has made these changes through <br />attrition. <br />• The Mayor's 21}06 general budget guidel~es for expenditures included no increase for <br />supplies and 5% reduction in other services unless unusual circumstances existed within a <br />specific department or fund For any increases the Mayor has asked every depanmeot to <br />try to cover these expenses within fund or departnaerrt by decreasing expenses, other than <br />personnel and unusual. circumstances. <br />The Self-Insurance Employee Benefit Fund continues to experience sizeable increases in <br />health insurance claim expenditures. in the 2006 budget the City increased the "the <br />employer" portion by 17.1% for Non Bargaining and Teamsters and 26.4% for Police and <br />Fire charged to each City department. This aggressive increase along with City wide <br />Bag <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.