Laserfiche WebLink
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting — October 3, 2003 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS <br />A. Public Hearings <br />(3) continued... <br />Mr. Rock noted that the Public Hearing file <br />was complete and requested the following <br />items be entered into the record: (1) Copy of <br />the Notice of Hearing; (2) Copy of <br />Resolution No. 2000; (3) Affidavits from the <br />Tri County News and South Bend Tribune <br />that the Notice of Public Hearing was <br />published in those newspapers on <br />September 19, 2003; (4) Statement from <br />staff that affected property owners, <br />registered neighborhood associations and <br />government units were notified; and (5) As <br />of 10:00 a.m. this morning, no written <br />remonstrances were received. <br />Ms. Greene noted that Resolution No. 2000 <br />is an amendment to a Development Plan <br />governed by Indiana Code 36 -7 -14 -17.5 and <br />the findings of the Commission must be that <br />the amendment to the Development Plan is <br />appropriate and reasonable and that it does <br />conform to the comprehensive plan for the <br />City of South Bend. <br />Mr. Faccenda stated for the record it is his <br />normal practice to abstain from voting on <br />issues involving the law firm of Barnes & <br />Thornburg from which he retired. Today his <br />vote is needed to establish a quorum. <br />Mr. Faccenda advised that there is no real <br />conflict of interest, only an apparent one. <br />Ms. Greene asked Mr. Faccenda if he had <br />any pecuniary interest in the proceedings. <br />Mr. Faccenda responded that he did not. <br />