My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-19-04 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
03-19-04 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2012 12:15:18 PM
Creation date
7/21/2011 3:02:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A <br />South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting —March 19, 2004 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS <br />A. Tax Abatements <br />(1) continued... <br />subsequently transferred to TriNet Essential <br />Facilities. TriNet Essential Facilities has <br />consistently complied with all annual <br />reporting requirements. <br />The building commissioner has reviewed the <br />petition and finds the property to be properly <br />zoned for the proposed project. The <br />building department also noted that a <br />building permit was issued to Cequent <br />Towing on March 11, 2004, approximately <br />six (6) days prior to the submission date of <br />the tax abatement request. A review of the <br />South Bend Redevelopment designation <br />areas finds that the property is located in the <br />Airport Economic Development Area, which <br />is a Tax Increment Allocation Area; <br />therefore, the petition for real property tax <br />abatement must first be approved by the <br />South Bend Redevelopment Commission. <br />Due to the issuance of the building permit <br />prior to approval of the tax abatement, the <br />petitioner does not meet the qualifications <br />for the requested abatement; however, the <br />petitioner has submitted a waiver resolution <br />which, if approved by the Council, would <br />allow the petitioner to be considered for the <br />abatement on the merits of the project. The <br />petitioner has indicated that they made a <br />good faith effort to comply with the <br />requirements, but unbeknownst to them a <br />building permit was pulled by one of the <br />contractors. If the Council approves the <br />G 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.