My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-22-04 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
10-22-04 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2012 12:09:54 PM
Creation date
7/21/2011 2:26:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A <br />Redevelopment Commission Meeting <br />Rescheduled Regular Meeting — October 22, 2004 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS <br />A. Public Hearing <br />(1) Public Hearing on Resolution No. 2090 <br />amending the Airport Economic <br />Development Area Development Plan. <br />Mr. Schalliol noted that Resolution No. 2090 <br />increases the boundary of the Airport <br />Economic Development Area by adding one <br />parcel of land located at 5965 Brick Road. <br />The expanded area is called Expansion Area <br />No. 19. <br />Ms. Greene noted that the amendment of a <br />Development Area or Plan is covered by I.C. <br />36 -7 -14 -17.5. Under this section of the <br />Indiana Code, the Commission is not <br />required to have evidence or make findings <br />that were required for the establishment of <br />the original development area. However, the <br />Commission is required to make the <br />following findings before approving the <br />amendment: (1) The amendment is <br />reasonable and appropriate when considered <br />in relation to the original resolution, plan and <br />purposes of I.C. 36 -7 -14, and (2) The <br />resolution or plan, with the proposed <br />amendment, conforms to the comprehensive <br />plan for the City of South Bend. Resolution <br />No. 2090 incorporates these findings and, <br />accordingly, the Commission's adoption of <br />Resolution 2090 as presented would satisfy <br />the requirements of the statute. In addition, <br />the Commission is required to consider any <br />written remonstrances that are filed during <br />the filing period specified in the notice. <br />Mr. Inks noted that the Public Hearing file <br />IL reveals that it contains the following items: <br />(1) A copy of the Notice of Hearing; (2) A <br />rd <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.