Laserfiche WebLink
14 <br />South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting — November 5, 2004 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (CONT.) <br />A. Public Hearing <br />(1) continued... <br />Ms. Greene noted that I.C. 36 -7 -14 -17.5 <br />governs the amendment of a development <br />plan. Under subsection (b) of this section <br />of the Code, the Commission is not <br />required to have evidence or make <br />findings that were required for the <br />establishment of the original <br />development area. However, the <br />Commission is required to make the <br />following findings before approving the <br />amendment: (1) The amendment is <br />reasonable and appropriate when <br />considered in relation to the original <br />resolution, plan and purposes of I.C. 36- <br />7 -14, and (2) The resolution or plan, with <br />the proposed amendment, conforms to <br />the comprehensive plan for the City. <br />Resolution No. 2105 includes this <br />language and, accordingly, the <br />Commission's adoption of Resolution <br />2105 as proposed would satisfy the <br />requirements of the statute. In addition, <br />the Commission is required to consider <br />any written remonstrances that are filed <br />during the filing period specified in the <br />notice. As noted by Mr. Inks, there were <br />no remonstrances filed. <br />Ms. Jones opened the Public Hearing for PUBLIC HEARING ON RESOLUTION No. 2105. <br />anyone who wished to speak for or <br />against Resolution No. 2105. There was <br />no one who wished to speak. Ms. Jones <br />closed the Public Hearing. <br />G <br />