My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-02-05 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
12-02-05 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2012 11:55:21 AM
Creation date
7/20/2011 4:02:04 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting — December 2, 2005 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (CONT.) <br />A. Public Hearing <br />(1) continued... <br />E. Sample St., and 903 E. Sample St. The <br />parcels are needed on the acquisition list to <br />finalize an acquisition process that began on <br />October 8, 2004 when the Redevelopment <br />Commission approved Resolution No. 2084 <br />to add to the Acquisition List a warehouse <br />building at 714 E. Sample St. owned by Art <br />Mosaic & Tile. On November 22, 2004 the <br />Commission purchased the warehouse <br />building to further complement the <br />acquisition efforts in the Sample St. triangle <br />located on the south side of Sample St. <br />Ms. Greene noted that under I.C. 36-7-14 - <br />17.5 which governs amending a development <br />plan, the Commission is not required to have <br />evidence or make findings that were required <br />for the establishment of the original <br />development area. However, the Commission <br />is required to make the following findings <br />before approving the amendment: (1) The <br />amendment is reasonable and appropriate <br />when considered in relation to the original <br />resolution, plan and purposes of I.C. 36 -7 -14, <br />and (2) The resolution or plan, with the <br />proposed amendment, conforms to the <br />comprehensive plan for the City. Resolution <br />No. 2192 includes this language and, <br />accordingly, adoption by the Commission <br />would satisfy the requirements of the statute. <br />In addition, the Commission is required to <br />hold a public hearing and to consider any <br />written remonstrances that are filed during <br />the filing period specified in the notice. <br />C6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.