My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-22-07 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
06-22-07 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2012 11:29:37 AM
Creation date
12/11/2007 3:24:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Date
6/22/2007
Document Relationships
06-22-07 Redevelopment Commission Agenda
(Superseded by)
Path:
\Public\Redevelopment Commission\Agendas & Packets\2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Rescheduled Regular Meeting — June 22, 2007 <br />b. NEW BUSINESS (CONY) <br />B. Northeast Neighborhood Development Area <br />(5) continued... <br />to be the coordinator when it seems like this <br />is something that should be done in house. <br />Mr. Inks: Two reasons. (1) The TIRO is <br />.ti.rxlatey familiar with the neighborhood <br />and the 111dr lduals there. They are in a <br />unique position to negotiate and acquire the <br />properties. 2 We have limited staff` <br />capacity in the department. While we can do <br />an. acquisition or two of properties here and <br />there, this project involves over 80 parcels of <br />property to be acquired over a short period of <br />tine. 'It is beyond our capacity to actually go <br />out and negotiate these transactions. <br />Mr. ec l o sl i : In Appendix. A to exhibit <br />C on pg 16, what's the rationale for gyring <br />COIT funding fFor the $937,500? Plus, ill <br />dote I. all these other possibilities of <br />estimated costs are going to add another <br />95000. Why is that included as just <br />note? :11. seems life it's doubling the total. <br />Mr. Inks: It is not doubling the total. It was <br />intended to be, since there is at least $82,500 <br />that is not specifically targeted to a specific <br />property, we know the properties that necd to <br />be acquired, we know the properties that <br />need to be demolished, and whcre the <br />relocation costs will be, but we know we <br />cannot fund them all. As you negotiate in <br />any situation, you are not exactly sure of the <br />order in which you may be able to acquire <br />properties or demolish them or relocate <br />people. What we've done is provide a total <br />list of everything that needs to be done. To <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.