My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-22-07 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
06-22-07 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2012 11:29:37 AM
Creation date
12/11/2007 3:24:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Date
6/22/2007
Document Relationships
06-22-07 Redevelopment Commission Agenda
(Superseded by)
Path:
\Public\Redevelopment Commission\Agendas & Packets\2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Rescheduled Regular Meeting — June 22, 2007 <br />5. OLD BUSINESS (CONY.) <br />B. South Bend Ventral Development Area <br />I continued... <br />under the agreement. That adds a level of <br />protection for the Commission. <br />Mr. Pec o vs is It looks to me like we're <br />doing $222,000. That's in granite here in the <br />offer and $48,,000 for streetscape and $5,000 <br />for business recniitmcnt. Plus, item types <br />mentioned at the bottom. Regarding the <br />$222,000 offer, who is doing the work and <br />why wasn't that competitively handled? <br />Mr. Leone: It's a different issue here. The <br />competitive bidding that this requires is to <br />the extent that these funds are used, are <br />contracted out by ITS, there must be <br />competitive bidding. IV's not this contract <br />itself that's being competitively bid. It is the <br />use of funds under this agreement that must <br />be competitively bid. <br />Mr. . King : I understand from reading in the <br />newspaper that the South Bend Common <br />Council actually took an action to <br />approprIa.te this am.o nt of money to ITS . <br />So, that's a decision that's already been sae <br />by the legislative body. I'm thinking that all <br />we're doing here now is settling on the terms <br />of the agreemcnt of what we get for the <br />money. <br />Mr. Inks: What the Council approved is <br />oIT funds. This is the TIF finding that the <br />Commission has appropriated this year. <br />Mr. Ding: So, this is separate from the <br />Council's. Yes. <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.