Laserfiche WebLink
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Rescheduled Regular Meeting June 8, 2007 <br />huge investment. Yes, right now, if you take <br />a look out there, it looks a whole lot better <br />for development, and we have more interest <br />in that area. <br />M.r.. eezl o vskl: But if you look at what <br />we're going to do by having the airport, <br />LaSalle Square, Hui-w.ich Iron and then the <br />Sample-Monroe district. If you look in the <br />dictionary under gerrymandering, that's <br />going to be the picture. We're going to have <br />this little dog on the end of a leash comil.g <br />here, them another corridor going down to <br />this. Why don't we just make all of our TIC` <br />districts one district` It looks like that's what <br />we're coming to. <br />Ms. .l t vY. <br />Q -id <br />- OMI C people- "a F Ne dof,lx 5.1i1.44. Ai \.Y <br />closer to home than you think. You are <br />getting ahead of yourself. That's not what <br />we're here for. I was just philosophizing <br />about general TI F. I'm not going to get into <br />how we've identified this place versus that <br />place. We're not going to get into that. <br />That's not for this discussion of this item. <br />Mr. Pe z o vski: I find it sort of related <br />because by agreeing to this it looks like <br />we're putting this one to bed in order to <br />facilitate the addition of this to the other TI. <br />Ms. Jones: I think we would do this no <br />natter whether there was nothing else going. <br />This is something we have to do and we've <br />obviously clone it before. <br />:fir. Pcezko vs is Weil, having done it before <br />is not a good recommendation. <br />Mr. Inks. From ray perspective, this is <br />completely independent of the other decision. <br />What we have here today is the fact that we <br />1 <br />