My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-07 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
05-08-07 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2012 11:51:44 AM
Creation date
12/11/2007 1:51:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Date
5/8/2007
Document Relationships
05-08-07 Redevelopment Commission Agenda
(Superseded by)
Path:
\Public\Redevelopment Commission\Agendas & Packets\2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commissloll <br />eschedUled Re War Meeting .-May 8, 200 <br />2. APPROVAL of Ml NurE <br />A. Approval of Mintites of the Regular Meeting of <br />Friday, April 20, 2007. <br />Mr. Pee l o vsl i noted that on pcy 12 of the i inutcs <br />the motion was made with reference made to <br />discussion in Executive Session, yet there is 110 <br />clarification as to what was said in Executive <br />Session. In cases of attcmpting to documcnt what <br />was said and what was exactly part of that motion', <br />that I s not included. Mr. Pee ko 'ski stated that <br />either the Commission Is lid violation of its bylaws <br />as to what can be di CUSSCd ill Executive Session <br />under I. C. 5-14-1.5-6. 1. or what was said ill <br />Executive Session needs to be Included. I <br />anybody needs to do research on this l articul6ar <br />topic, there's nothing g to go back to. Mr. <br />Pec l o vski surmised that no notes or .record ino of <br />the conversation In ExeCLItIVC Session. So, if <br />things do come up where the Commission has a <br />discussion in Executive Session and it's referred to <br />in the regular meeting, we Bleed to have it referent.. <br />Ms.. ones asked Ms. Phipps to review the tapes to <br />see if there was anything on the tape. If not, them <br />maybe there was no ov rsi ght in not mentioning <br />exactly what we said iii Executive Session. <br />Mr. Pec ko vs i stated that the Commission <br />shouldn't waste its time at the regular meeting <br />going over the sane material that it has discussed <br />in Executive Session. Mr. Pec l owsl i moved that <br />the Minutes be amended to include that which was <br />said in the Executive Session. <br />Mr. Leone noted that the motion at the April 20 <br />meeting was Mr. Pce o l is motion. He <br />suggested that 1f .Mr_ Peczkowski had specifics <br />language how that motion should be revised in the <br />minutes, he could provide that to Ms. Phipps. Mr. <br />Leone stated that the Commission will review the <br />addition at its next meeting. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.