Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING JUNE 13, 2011 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Puzzello reiterated that she believes that St. Joseph High School will be a wonderful <br />addition to South Bend. <br /> <br />Councilmember Henry Davis wanted to clarify some things. He stated that his position <br />on this has nothing to with being against St. Joseph High School moving into the <br />proposed area. He stated that he thinks it will be a great addition. He stated that his <br />stance is based upon priorities for the City of South Bend and how it relates to spending <br />public tax dollars. He stated that now we have an influx of dollars going to the east side <br />of the river rather than the west side of the river or spent equitability throughout the <br />whole city. This is not a west side deal, it’s not south side deal, this is the lifeline of the <br />City of South Bend. He stated that they have to come together and prioritize how they <br />spend tax dollars to best suit the growth of the city. He stated that if you noticed all of <br />the new taxable land; all of the new private businesses are going across the river and the <br />last time that he saw an example of that it is St. Joseph Michigan and Benton Harbor. He <br />stated that he would hate for our city to turn into what St. Joe and Benton Harbor have <br />become and cannot compete against each other. Mr. Davis stated the school zone report <br />he remembered back approximately three or four months ago going over that report with <br />the Public Works Director and found that they have been lax for approximately 20 years <br />in making sure that school zone are painted and lighted properly whether they are within <br />a parochial school district or a private school district. He stated so that when the <br />argument arises that they are using it for a charter school, it is our obligation to make sure <br />all school zones are guarded safely. He stated that was discussed during the budget cut <br />backs and eliminated school crossing guards. He stated that the discussion of using funds <br />for one project or another could go on for days. He just wanted to see growth in the way <br />that it is meant to be using tax dollars to produce more tax dollars for more opportunity <br />for the citizens of South Bend. He stated that he will not be in support of anything today <br />as it relates to this bill. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rouse called for a point of order, stating that Councilmember Varner <br />wanted some clarification on the amended bill. <br /> <br />Councilmember Varner stated that for the sake of consideration on the amended request, <br />he made a request this afternoon and the Mayor restated somewhat differently. He stated <br />that his suggestion was that if there was infrastructure or building cost that it be limited to <br />the cost of the building one or the other. He stated that he wasn’t suggestion that it would <br />be 1.2 million dollars which is what he thinks the Mayor took from it. He stated that he <br />is looking for an either or in a compromise and maybe we can’t address that tonight but <br />that was the nature of his intent not the way the Mayor restated it and that maybe where <br />some of the confusion came in. <br /> <br />Councilmember Oliver Davis stated that he understand Councilmember Varner’s point, <br />however, he hoped that they would just address item’s #2; #3 and #4 tonight. He stated <br />that he has great concerns with item #1. He stated that he likes what Councilmember <br />Varner has said and thinks that it can be talked about in further discussion about how that <br />could be applied. He stated that he doesn’t think that tonight is the night to do that. He <br />stated that he has been approached by his neighbors on this issue and advised that he has <br />donated some of his City Council earnings to the Catholic Schools in his own area, Our <br />Lady of Hungry and St. Adalbert’s. He reiterated that it was his own personal monies <br />and own uses. He stated that he still has issues utilizing tax monies for private schools <br />even though he believes in and is a product of private education. He stated that he is in <br />support of items #2, #3 and #4 tonight and with the issue that Councilmember Varner has <br />raised which is a good one especially when they are looking at infrastructure for any part <br />of the city whether it covers private or public, they can come back and look at that to see <br />what kind of development could go into that area. <br /> <br />Councilmember Oliver Davis made a motion to accept only item #’s 2, 3, and 4 at this <br />time. Councilmember White seconded the motion. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 20 <br /> <br />