Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING JUNE 13, 2011 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Councilmember Henry Davis asked Mayor Luecke to do the right thing, regardless if they <br />don’t put the board together. <br /> <br />Councilmember Henry Davis asked if the 1.2 million dollars is not given to the St. Joseph <br />High School property would it stop the development. He stated that he was told no. So <br />why are still asking for this. <br /> <br />Mayor Luecke advised that they are investing a million dollars to bring a 35 million <br />dollar investment into the community. He stated that they have not reached the full 35 <br />million dollar fund raising goal at this point, and adding another 1.2 million dollars on <br />top of on what is an extraordinary goal is a very difficult challenge. He believes that it is <br />appropriate for the City to be a partner with them as they move forward. <br /> <br />Councilmember Henry Davis asked if they were getting any tax revenue from this. <br /> <br />Mayor Luecke stated no. The site is currently a tax exempt site and it will continue to be <br />a tax exempt site. He stated that they don’t any tax revenue from the South Bend <br />Community School Corporation projects that have been suggested that they invest in as <br />well. <br /> <br />Councilmember Henry Davis stated that is comparing apples to oranges, public versus <br />private institutions. Public school is what we all pay for through out tax dollars and <br />checks that we earn or maybe even not, but we still pay for it. Private institutions are <br />what we pay out extra if we choose to go to those institutions. He stated that there is a <br />choice either or, but the public is allow to us or given to us just by being a resident of the <br />City of South Bend. So you can’t compare the two. <br /> <br />Mayor Luecke stated that Councilmember Davis was very insistent upon the City <br />spending money to put traffic signals at a private school. <br /> <br />Councilmember Henry Davis stated that it was for the safety of the children walking <br />across a busy highway. That it would be in the city’s best interest before a lawsuit was <br />filed because someone got hit by a motorist going 50 mph down the street with no police <br />patrol is a hazard to the whole community. He stated that he was very persistent on that <br />issue and thanked Mayor Luecke for his help on that. He stated that he feels that was the <br />right thing to do. However, he does not feel the same way about St. Joseph High School <br />when they are already going to spend 35 million, what is 1.2 million to them. They have <br />already got it. <br /> <br />Mayor Luecke stated no they don’t. <br /> <br />Councilmember Henry Davis stated that there are better places to spend that money and <br />he could go on for days about District 2, about the things that they need over there and <br />for the city to act like it is nothing is a shame and he is embarrassed. <br /> <br />Council Attorney Kathleen Cekanski stated that at the Personnel & Finance Committee <br />Meeting a suggestion was made that perhaps the Public Benefit Test which was set forth <br />in Mr. Leone’s the City Attorney’s memorandum be included as part of the amendment <br />to the bill where it is limiting to the four (4) items. The purposed language would go in <br />Section I right after all for items Site Consolidation for 1.2 million; Utility Relocation <br />$60,000; River walk Repairs $50,000; Equipment Investment $40,000 and right after that <br />the Council could consider the following language: “The site consolidation appropriation <br />of $1.2 million dollars is subject to a written agreement setting forth in detail the public <br />benefits which shall be provided to the citizens of South Bend. Such public benefits must <br />include, but shall not be limited to the use of the outside athletic field by the South Bend <br />Community School Corporation and other public entities on dates when St. Joseph High <br />School does not have a conflicting scheduled event; and to have access to other limited <br />indoor venues during the Summer on dates when the school does not have a conflicting <br />scheduled event. Such written agreement shall be filed with the Office of the Clerk.” <br />She stated that is a separate amendment in light of the discussion that took place between <br /> 13 <br /> <br />