Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING JUNE 13, 2011 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />community. The investment that they are making here is similar to the investment that <br />they made at the Kroc Center on the west-side of South Bend, where they invested 1 <br />million dollars to bring a 40 million dollar investment to the community. Mayor Luecke <br />stated again, in exchange for services that are provided to members of our community <br />through the Kroc Center. He stated that he believes that is a positive precedent and one <br />that allows them to continue to make the investment in St. Joseph High School. The <br />question is why the Family Dollar Store, how did we end up with this particular parcel <br />and the investment that they are making and what is the valuation that brought us to price <br />that they are suggesting for this store. He reiterated what was said in the Committee <br />Meeting that St. Joseph High School has not asked us for any other participation in this <br />project. There are many things that they could have asked for, additional dollars that they <br />could have put in from the city, but they have not asked that of us. He stated that as they <br />were talking with them about the development of the site, early on they had looked at a <br />corridor for a new sewer line that would run through the Family Dollar facility. So it <br />made sense to them at that point to say that they would take on acquisition of that site <br />because they were going to need it for the sewer line. St. Joe would have provided a <br />utility easement along the rest of their property to the city to allow that sewer line to go <br />into place. Since that time they have decided to put that sewer in the street because of <br />construction timing issues both for the sewer as well as for construction of the new St. <br />Joseph High School as well as for additional cost. Had they followed that original <br />corridor they would not only have had to buy Family Dollar but additional properties <br />down the road. So it would have been even more expensive than the 1.2 million dollars <br />that they are talking about today. He reiterated that he believes this is an important <br />investment for the City of South Bend, in terms of the price; the valuation of the building <br />is really based on income stream. He stated that a presentation was given by Don Inks <br />concerning that income stream and what that value leads to, somewhere between 650,000 <br />to 750,000 as a formula that would recognize the income stream that is there. But in <br />addition to buying the building based on that income stream there is also a tenant in that <br />building and so there is a cost to buy out that tenant and the lease that the tenant has in <br />the building. Furthermore, this is not a seller who had the property on the market. He <br />stated that sometime the City of South Bend and other buyers who are buying at not the <br />opportune time pay a premium over and above the appraised value of the property. It is <br />those three factors really that have led us to the 1.2 million dollar figure that they believe <br />is appropriate and believe is great leverage for us as we look at a 35 million dollar <br />investment in our community that they thinks is good for development in the surrounding <br />neighborhood, development in the East Bank and Downtown as they move forward. <br /> <br />Councilmember Oliver Davis asked the Mayor to explain why they are using an appraisal <br />that is out of date and what is the City’s plan to replace the Family Dollar so that the <br />residents of the neighborhood will have some place to shop. <br /> <br />Mayor Luecke advised that the information provided to Council earlier referenced <br />appraisals that had been done not saying that was what they were using as the basis for <br />their price but to show a comparison to the price that they generated. He stated that the <br />staff actually used a formula based on the income stream of the property to generate what <br />they believe is the appropriate value. That the assumptions that they have used have been <br />validated by an MIA Appraiser in saying that they have made the right assumptions to <br />come to value that they came to, so they weren’t using the 2002 appraisal or the 2007 <br />appraisals, they showed them as comparison that the value that they came to was a <br />comparable value. In terms of if this store closes which it would obviously if they <br />acquire the property and then transfer it. They certainly will look to attract services for <br />the neighborhood and for the downtown area that will be appropriate for the residents in <br />the area. He stated that he has no guarantees that will happen, but is certainly is on their <br />list of important things to do as they move forward. <br /> <br />Councilmember White stated that she is going to wait with her comments until she hears <br />from the public. Her concerns are after hearing the public’s concerns what direction the <br />Council is going to take on how there are going to receive information and the nature of <br />that information and where do they go from here. <br /> <br /> 11 <br /> <br />