My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-16-07 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
02-16-07 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2008 10:17:10 AM
Creation date
12/11/2007 1:45:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Date
2/16/2007
Document Relationships
02-16-07 Redevelopment Commission Agenda
(Superseded by)
Path:
\Public\Redevelopment Commission\Agendas & Packets\2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting -February 16, 2007 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (CONT.) <br />A. Public Hearings <br />() continued... <br />Mr. Schalliol noted that the Public Hearing <br />file is complete and requested the following <br />items be entered into the record: (1) a copy <br />of the Notice of Hearing; (2) a copy of <br />Resolution No. 2311; (3) an affidavit from <br />the Tri County News and South Bend <br />Tribune that the Notice of Public Hearing <br />was published in those newspapers on <br />February 2, 2007 ; (4) a statement from Mr. <br />Schalliol that on February 5, 2007, a copy of <br />the Notice of Hearing was sent to the <br />affected property owners and registered <br />neighborhood associations; and (5) as of <br />10:00 a.m. February 16, 2007, no written <br />remonstrances were received. <br />Mr. Schalliol noted that the purpose of the <br />boundary contraction is to remove a portion <br />of property that has been de-annexed from <br />the City of South Bend at the southwest <br />corner of Eddy and the old Edison Road. <br />Ms. Greene noted that under I.C. 36-7-14- <br />17.5,the Commission is not required to have <br />evidence or make findings that were required <br />for the establishment of the original <br />development area. However, the Commission <br />is required to make the following findings <br />before approving the amendment: (1) The <br />amendment is reasonable and appropriate <br />when considered in relation to the original <br />resolution, plan and purposes ofI.C. 36-7-14, <br />and (2) The resolution or plan, with the <br />proposed amendment, conforms to the <br />comprehensive plan for the City. Resolution <br />No. 2311, as presented, incorporates these <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.