My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-05-06 Community & Economic Development
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
2006
>
09-05-06 Community & Economic Development
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2007 3:45:28 PM
Creation date
12/10/2007 11:45:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Counci - Date
9/5/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Marty Wolfson asked far specifics as to the number of jabs created, pay of jobs, tax base <br />expansion, and dollars invested. <br />Pat McMahan responded by saying while specific results were difficult to quantify he <br />could nonetheless point to success stories like PEI Industries and the Corporate Services <br />story. All long-term success stories. <br />Marty Wolfson pointed out there have been few success stories lately. <br />Pat McMahon described economic development efforts needing to have a long term <br />strategy and long-term commitment reflecting a long term. view. In that the economy is <br />always in transition he described Project Future's change in focus responding to realities <br />locally, nationally, and globally as well. Project Future's focus once on manufacturing <br />shifted to plastics, to warehousing and distribution, then to high tech, always in the <br />process of self analysis and reinvention. This dynamic economic development process <br />requires more communication with all sectors of the economy public and private. There <br />has to develop an awareness that economic development is very competitive. Project <br />Future's task is to meet and exceed the competition, marshalling resources, asking <br />questions, recognizing we are all partners in economic development, each a role player. <br />Councilmember Puzzello asked Mr. McMahon to expand on partnerships, specifically <br />Metronet. <br />McMahon described at length, the genesis of Metronet. Beginning with a recognition of <br />the need for heavy data transfer for broadband users to serve present and attract new <br />users Project Future worked in partnership with private and public entities to conceive, <br />design, finance, and build Metronet. This infrastructure has the capabilities far data <br />processing few communities nationwide can boast. A Metronet non-profit managing <br />company governed by a representative board with Project Future involvement guides the <br />nets use. <br />Councilmember Varner stated that Project Future should not be involved in the <br />management of Metronet, but restricts itself to marketing the area. <br />Pat McMahon responded maintaining Project Future separation from Metronet each <br />having its own governance. <br />Councilmember Varner sees too much overlap. <br />Councilmember Pfeifer questioned whether Project Future matches the needs of the <br />community wondering if the city's economic development dollars were best spent with <br />Project Future. She also questioned the diversity of the Board of Directors for Project <br />Future reflecting gender, class, as well as race. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.