Laserfiche WebLink
Commune and conoma ®ouelopmon commt~eo <br />"006 SotiL1~ i3e~1a C'cz~nmou Cixu~cil <br />The January 12, ?flf)G, »eetl€~s ol~the. C'or~~~~lunity a~~d Fco€~on~ric Deveiopn~ent Con7n~ittee was <br />called to order by its Chairperson, Council Mel~€ber Roland belly at 3:35 p.-3-t. in the Co€.€3~czi <br />informal Meeting IZoo€'n. <br />i?€:rs©ns in attendance included C~ur€cil l+lleinlaers Deily, P€~z~elio, Write and Rouse; Martha <br />Lewis, Co€n€r~uni.t~t and Economic Development executive I~irectox Sharon T~endali, Dori Inds, <br />:fennifer t~aurent, ar~d Kathleen Cekar4sl~.iT~'arra~~d, C©€€ncii Attorney. <br />Council Me€n.ber K.el.ly noted that this meeti€~~ had been coordinated by Co€.lncil Ivlei~€l~er <br />Puzzeli.o in order to Dave an update an vario€!s projects goi~~w on in the Depart€~~ent csf <br />Co€~€~~€nity a€~d Fcc~l~o~z~ic Develop€~ent. <br />Don. Inks thanked Cor€ncil ~e€nber Pttzrello t=or reci~€estin;~ su~;h an update. ~e noted that thc; <br />~~.eeting will address three (3} basic areas: <br />1. l~e~ req~eest fc~r ~aro~~osaai {~FIE~~ lvr~nat <br />2. 1~a'ew i~rc~cess fa>;- s~sch regraests <br />3. t;pc~ate o~ Fc~€~r {~~ i~ro~ects <br />Mr. inks noted that the forger for€~at €e~et ali of the required statutory require~~:aents. ~€'1€e new <br />Iortnat puts thy; property into context ar~d as a rest€it it also serves as a ~~arketing t~oi. .All r4f this <br />ij~forrr~at-ion is posted c)n tine depart€nent's ovebsite. i-~e tlYen provided two (.7j multi-pace <br />handouts to tl~e Cono~x€iE:tee ~copie~s attached}, tl7e .first being tine "Proposal Documents a.r±d <br />~'oxms fcr Propert}I Disposi4ion" (old foxn~at} a€td the second 15eing tl~e " 1'ropasal Docu€nents and <br />~~~~-!~€s for 1'rc€t~erty disposition" (new for€a~at which il~cl~€des as~~c~ng. other things city seal:, a€~d <br />1=3uilding a 21st ~`e€~ttrtry City logo on the cc~Wer ease and ~3ew l~a~es entitled "~)ve~°view anal <br />Project Description" which il~tci€€des €~€aps, pictures, o~elasite infox€~natt~n ar~cf detailed <br />info€°~~ation on the South Bend cojr-€~nunity. <br />Disc€€ssion t4oen tcsok place as to whethe!- refe€-ences shc€uld lie made to the South lend <br />Coy€~unity Sc,i€©oi. :Many stressed the fact. that South 1-3er~d has ~nar~y eluai.ity hi~;l€e~~ ed€€catior~ <br />institutions loth in t}~e city and geo~~rapl:€ically close to tl€e city li€~its. the cl?alie€~ses o± the <br />secondary school syste7~~s and the role that reactors play in this area was discussed at lensth. <br />Co€~atnents on the effectiveness or i.neffeetiveness of Plan ~ were also €~aac~e ley the various <br />Cot€ncii {ufei~nl~e€'s. <br />I'kT€°. Inks €€c~ted that 1€e would reco:€~irnend that there not le a reterer€ce to secondary schLOls, <br />i€owever that the i€~fc~r€~ation should stress the cities proximity tt~ the flt€iversity oi`Notre Dame. <br />Coy€ncil l~en~ber White noted tl~-at she saes the n.ew fo€-~-€~€at as a PR piece for the city and she <br />sees the ene€.gy fr~rn ti€e neon for~~~at. <br />in response to a cluesti.ol:€ frc~l-~~€ C:oul~ci.l.1`~lernber 1'€azzello, Mr. Inks noted that ti?e o~.d fo€-€nat was <br />very statutory in nature. The :new format captures the statutory requirements lout also helps sell <br />.ham~~~n i?; 2000 Co~~-~azlm~it}' rsi~c~ T:conorttic i~et'~lo~n~en! Crnnn~itt'ec Meeting. M3nutxs -t'~age ! cif 2- <br />