My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-13-05 Council Meeting Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Common Council Meeting Minutes
>
2005
>
06-13-05 Council Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2007 10:56:41 AM
Creation date
12/10/2007 10:56:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Counci - Date
6/13/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETINGJUNE 13, 2005 <br />BILL NO. 30-05 PUBLIC HEARING ON A BILL OF THE CITY OF <br /> SOUTH BEND, INDIANA AMENDING CHAPTER 14, <br /> ARTICLE 2, SECTION 14-8 OF THE SOUTH BEND <br /> MUNICIPAL CODE TO CLARIFY EXCEPTIONS TO <br /> CURFEW VIOLATIONS <br />Councilmember Kuspa made a motion to consider the substitute version of this bill. <br />Councilmember Dieter seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of eight (8) <br />ayes. <br />Councilmember White, Chairperson, Health and Public Safety Committee, reported that <br />this committee met this afternoon on this substitute version of this bill and sends it to the <br />Council with a favorable recommendation. <br />Ms. Aladean DeRose, Chief Assistant City Attorney, 1400 County-City Building, South <br />Bend, Indiana, made the presentation for this bill. <br />Ms. DeRose advised that the difference between the ordinance as originally submitted <br />and this substitute is at subsection (c) of Municipal Code §14-8. The new language <br />clarifies that a minor who participates in an activity at the direction of a parent, guardian <br />or custodian must have in his/her possession an actual writing signed by the appropriate <br />adult which directs the minor to participate in such an activity. This reduces the risk of <br />false claims about adult permission. Ms. DeRose further advised that within the last year <br />a federal court invalidated Indiana’s criminal curfew ordinance on constitutional grounds, <br />holding that it violated parental rights to control the upbringing of a child. The Indiana <br />General Assembly proposed an amendment to cure the constitutional defect in the <br />Indiana Criminal law, but due to more pressing issues, did not pass the legislation. Ms. <br />DeRose stated that it is the legal department’s opinion that civil penalties for curfew <br />violations are not subject to the same constitutional scrutiny as criminal penalties. <br />Nonetheless, in the interest of parents within the City, we propose to amend South Bend’s <br />curfew ordinance to exempt from curfew regulation those minors who are participating in <br />an activity for which they have written parental permission. This language is identical to <br />that proposed by the General Assembly in its last session. The attached ordinance also <br />makes a gender change in language and adds another exception included in the state <br />criminal law for minors who are passing through Indiana for other state or international <br />destinations. <br />Police Chief Thomas Fautz, 701 W. Sample Street, South Bend, Indiana, advised that the <br />South Bend Police Department believes that the City’s civil curfew laws are an effective <br />tool in curtailing crime by minors and protecting minors from crime victimization. <br />This being the time heretofore set for the Public Hearing on the above bill, proponents <br />and opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. <br />There being no one present wishing to speak to the Council either in favor of or in <br />opposition to this bill, Councilmember White made a motion for favorable <br />recommendation to full Council concerning this bill. Councilmember Varner seconded <br />the motion which carried by a voice vote of eight (8) ayes. <br />RECONSIDERATION OF BILL NO. 30-05 <br />At this time Councilmember Rouse made a motion that the Council give consideration to <br />Bill No. 30-05 due to an error found in the bill. Councilmember Dieter seconded the <br />motion which carried by a voice vote of eight (8) ayes. <br />Council Attorney Kathleen Cekanski-Farrand advised that in Section I (d) (4) to strike the <br />period and add a semicolon and the word or. <br />Councilmember Varner made a motion to amend substitute Bill No. 30-05. <br />Councilmember Rouse seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of eight (8) <br />ayes. <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.