Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 25, 2006 <br />Councilmember Varner stated that one of the responsibilities and duties as a <br />Councilmember is to see to it that when an issue like the greenhouse comes up, that the <br />Council has all the information presented to them, and good information is essential in <br />making the right decision. The Council has an obligation to look into the Greenhouse <br />issue deeper. An honest chance needs to be given and that has not happened. All options <br />need to be looked at whether or not to keep the greenhouse open or having to close it, <br />because it may not be fiscally responsible to do so. <br />Councilmember Puzzello, stated that because this part of the budget has to be passed by <br />st <br />the 1 of October, she did not think that the Council would have time to look at the <br />Greenhouse issue properly to see where cuts could possibly be made to keep it open. She <br />stated that she is in favor of passing the budget as it stands now, with no funding for the <br />greenhouse, however, when the Mayor and the Administration look at possible funding <br />opportunities that the Council be involved in that process and the best Committee is the <br />PARC Committee, headed by Councilmember Dieter, to be part of the process in finding <br />money to keep the Greenhouse open. <br />Councilmember Kelly stated that this is not an easy thing to do. There has been an <br />outpouring of citizen support for the greenhouses and conservatories. He stated that the <br />rd <br />Council should do all in their power to save them. This exists in the 3 District, which he <br />noted that he was elected to represent, so this is a passionate issue for him. Many, many <br />citizens of the District have signed a petition indicating their support and now the next <br />questions is the support of finding money. That is the critical issue here, no question <br />about it. To maintain the greenhouse and conservatory in the right fashion will take a lot <br />of money, and how the City goes about getting that, whether it is by foundations, grants, <br />or donations, this is an issue that is near and dear to his heart. He noted that the <br />greenhouse and conservatory have been a part of the community for a great number of <br />years and he would like keep it that way. <br />Councilmember Pfeifer stated that it is always a good thing when community members <br />get excited and become involved in issues that are of concern in the City. She stated that <br />she does not have a problem passing this bill the way that it has been presented. She <br />stated that she has every faith that the Administration and the Council will work together <br />and do everything possible to resolve the Greenhouse issue. <br />Councilmember Dieter thanked Mayor Luecke for reconsidering looking at the <br />Greenhouse and Conservatory and stated that he believes very confidently that the <br />funding can be found through the community and various departments like the Historic <br />Preservation Commission and through grants and donations. <br />th <br />Mayor Luecke, 14 Floor County-City Building, 227 W. Jefferson Blvd., South Bend, <br />Indiana, stated that he committed in the Committee Meeting this afternoon, that the <br />Administration will put together more detailed figures within a thirty (30) day period, to <br />bring back to the Council, along with Councilmember Dieter, Chairperson, PARCS <br />Committee will be a part of that process, along with Catherine Hostetler, Director, <br />Historic Preservation Commission to include her in the process as well. Mayor Luecke <br />stated that Phil St. Clair, Director of the Parks Department, has had architects in the <br />buildings before to look at a number of different scenarios. Mr. St. Clair had them there <br />before to inquire on what it would take to completely renovate the entire complex or what <br />would it take to move the entire complex. The Park Department contemplated moving <br />this facility into the Zoo. The direction at this point is to say, what are some different <br />options, if the greenhouse is removed and the conservatory is kept. What would the cost <br />be, not only to do the needed repairs, but also to try to estimate an operating budget? <br />Another option would be to keep some of the original greenhouses plus the <br />conservatories, and then what would that cost be? Both capital and operational cost. The <br />Mayor reiterated his commitment to come back to the table with that. Mayor Luecke <br />stated to Council President Rouse that he could not commit that the Administration <br />would have a resolution to what he is asking for. But the Mayor stated that he would <br />come back with numbers that talk about what is needed to do it, and then engage and <br />enter into conversation with the Council about finding resources to do that together. The <br />key issue here is not the capital side, generally you can get dollars to make repairs or <br />8 <br /> <br />